header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

LESSER METATARSOPHALANGEAL INSTABILITY: A COHORT STUDY OF CLINICAL FEATURES AND OUTCOMES



Abstract

Introduction: Lesser metatarsophalangeal instability is a common cause of forefoot pain. Previous studies were small and there is little data comparing surgical with non-surgical treatment.

Patients and Methods: Metatarsophalangeal instability was diagnosed and staged with the draw test. We recorded the clinical presentation, involved toes, severity of instability, presence of toe deformity and management. Patients were followed-up in clinic or by telephone interview with visual analogue pain and satisfaction scores and AOFAS lesser metatarsophalangeal scores. Outcomes were assessed by an independent observer.

Results: We studied 154 patients: 127 (82%) female and 27 (18%) male. The median age was 56 years (range 33–85). One foot was affected in 107 patients (69%) and both feet in 47 (31%). The second toe only was affected in 99 patients (64%) and multiple toes in 52 (34%). Seventy-three patients (47%) had a complaint of generalised forefoot pain. Sixty-eight (44%) had pain and deformity localised to the second toe. Thirteen patients (8%) had toe deformity with significant MTPJ instability. 150 toes (52%) had grade 1 instability, 108 (37%) grade 2 instability and 21 (7%) grade 3 instability. Twelve toes (4%) presented dislocated with a history of instability. Ninety-nine patients (64%) were treated conservatively, using functional taping, shoe modifications, insoles and injections. Fifty-five patients (36%) had surgery, including lesser toe straightening, flexor-extensor transfer, plantar plate repair, Weil and Stainsby procedures. 79% of patients were reviewed at a mean of 65 months (range 14 to 138). Mean pain score was 31mm ± 23.7mm for the conservative group and 23mm ± 24.1mm in the surgical group. Mean AOFAS score was 69 ± 16.3 for the conservative group and 67 ± 17.8 in the surgical group. 39 (52%) conservatively treated patients were either satisfied or very satisfied compared to 31 (66%) surgically treated patients. No differences were statistically significant.

Correspondence should be addressed to: Mr Andrew H. N. Robinson, Editorial Secretary, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, BOX 37, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, England.