header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

PINCHING FROM THE SHOULDER? USE OF PHILOS PLATE OR BLADE PLATE AS A FIXED ANGLE DEVICE FOR COMPLEX TIBIOTALAR AND TIBIOTALOCALCANEAL FUSION



Abstract

Background: Complex tibiotalar (TT) and tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) fusions are performed for significant ankle and hindfoot arthritis and/or deformity. Literature suggests several methods of fixation including crossed screws, plates, nail and external fixation. These are technically difficult operations with reported complication rates as high as 30–80%. We present a retrospective cohort study of angle blade plate and PHILOS plate fixation for these patients in our hospital.

Methods: This study describes 21 consecutive patients with 22 TT or TTC fusions between December 2005 and May 2009. The surgery was performed for severe deformity or arthritis as a result of: osteoarthritis(2), post-traumatic arthritis(4), rheumatoid arthritis (7), Charcot arthropathy (5), avascular necrosis(1), and post traumatic avascular necrosis (3). The senior author performed all of the operations. In the first ten cases (two TT and eight TTC) an angle blade plate was used, A PHILOS plate was used in the subsequent ten cases (three TT and seven TTC). One patient had bilateral TTC fusions with a blade plate on one side and a PHILOS plate on the other. There were eight male and 13 female patients. All the procedures were performed through a lateral transfibular approach. The patients were followed up regularly with clinical and radiological evaluation until union or otherwise.

Results: Fusion was achieved in 19 out of 21 patients (90.5%) and 20 out of 22 arthrodeses (90.9%). All five TT fusions went on to union (100%). Fifteen out of 17 TTC fusions united (88.2%). One TTC fusion using an angle blade plate needed revision surgery for non-union of subtalar joint. In the PHILOS group one patient developed MRSA infection of the surgical site leading to non-union. This necessiated removal of metal and prolonged treatment with intravenous antibiotics. The patient now has a relatively painless fibrous ankylosis.

Conclusion: TT and TTC fusions are complex operations performed for severe arthritis and deformity, often on patients with significant co-morbidities. It is a salvage procedure to relieve pain and/or correct deformity of the foot and ankle. This study suggests that both the angle blade plate and PHILOS plate provide a stable fixed angle construct, which achieves a high rate of bony union with alignment correction.

Correspondence should be addressed to: Mr Andrew H. N. Robinson, Editorial Secretary, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, BOX 37, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, England.