header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

A847. STRESS EVALUATION OF STEMLESS, ULTRA-SHORT AND SHORT STEM PROXIMAL FILL FEMORAL IMPLANTS



Abstract

Over the last two decades, design modifications in cementless total hip arthoplasty have led to longer lasting implants and an increased success rate. However, there remains limitations to the cementless femoral stem implant. Traditional cementless femoral components require large amounts of bone to be broached prior to stem insertion (1). This leads to a decrease in host bone stock, which can become problematic in a young patient who may eventually require a revision operation during his or her lifetime. Osteopenia, only second to distal stress shielding can lead to aseptic loosening of the implant and stem subsidence, which also accelerates the need for a revision operation (24). Recent literature suggests that thigh pain due to distal canal fixation, micro-motion, uneven stress patterns or cortex impingement by the femoral stem is directly correlated to increased stem sizes and often very disabling to a patient (58). In this study, we sought to determine whether reducing stem length in the femoral implant would produce more physiologic loading characteristics in the proximal femur and thus eliminate any remaining stress shielding that is present in the current design. We analyzed the surface strains in 13 femurs implanted with

  1. no implants,

  2. stemless,

  3. ultra short and

  4. short stem proximal fill implants in a test rig designed to assimilate muscle forces across the hip joints, including the ilio-tibial band and the hip abductors.

Analysis of the resulting surface strains was performed using the photoelastic method. For each femur, intact and with the different stem length components in place, the fringe patterns were compared at the same applied loads. The highest fringe orders observed for all tests were located on the lateral proximal femur and medial proximal femur. The fringes decreased as they approached the neutral axis of bending (posterior and anterior). Distal fringe patterns were more prominent as the stem length increased. The results demonstrate that the stemless design most closely replicated normal strain patterns seen in a native femur during simulated gait. The presence of a stemless, ultra short and short stem reduced proximal strain and increased distal strain linearly, thereby increasing the potential for stress shielding. The stemless design most closely replicated normal strain patterns observed in a native femur and for this reason has the potential to address the shortcomings of the traditional cementless femoral implant.

Correspondence should be addressed to Diane Przepiorski at ISTA, PO Box 6564, Auburn, CA 95604, USA. Phone: +1 916-454-9884; Fax: +1 916-454-9882; E-mail: ista@pacbell.net

References:

1 Learmonth, ID, Grobler GP, DAll DM, Jandera V: Loss of bone stock with cementless hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty1995, 10: 257–63. Google Scholar

2 Kawamura H, Dunbar MJ, Murray P, Bourne RB, Rorabek CH: The porous coated anatomic total hip replacement. A ten to fourteen year follow-up study of a cenetless total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am2001, 83-A:1333–1338. Google Scholar

3 Padgett DE, Warashina H: The unstable total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Rel Res2004: 72–79. Google Scholar

4 Malchau H, Herberts P, Ahnfelt L: Prognosis of total hip replacement in Sweden. Follow up of 92,675 operations performed 1978–1990. Acta Orthop Scan1993, 64: 497–506. Google Scholar

5 Brown TE, Larson B, Shen F, Moskal JT: Thigh pain after cementless total hip arthroplasty: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg2002, 10: 385–92. Google Scholar

6 Kim YH, Kim JS, Cho SH: Primary total hip arthroplasty with a cementless porous coated anatomic total hip prosthesis: 10–12 year results of prospective consecutive series. J Arthroplasty1999, 14: 538–548. Google Scholar

7 Mishra AK, Skinner HB, Davidson JA: Stem loosening and thigh pain in THA: are they related to prosthesis stiffness? Orthopaedics1997, 20: 58–61. Google Scholar

8 Vresilovic EJ, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH: Incidence of thigh pain after uncemented total hip arthroplasty as a function of femoral stem size. J Arthroplasty1996, 11: 304–311. Google Scholar