header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

A823. EXPERIMENTAL AND FINITE ELEMENT CORROBORATION OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF A CEMENTLESS HIP REPLACEMENT



Abstract

Excessive implant migration and micromotion have been related to eventual implant loosening. The aim of this project is to develop a computational tool that will be able to predict the mechanical performance of a cementless implant in the presence of uncertainty, for example through variations in implant alignment or bone quality. To achieve this aim, a computational model has to be developed and implemented. However, to gain confidence in the model, it should be verified experimentally. To this end, the present work investigated the behavior of a cementless implant experimentally, and compared the results with a computational model of the same test setup.

A synthetic bone (item 3406, Sawbones Europe AB, Sweden) was surgically implanted with a Furlong cementless stem (JRI, Sheffield, UK) in a neutral position and subjected to a compression fatigue test of −200 N to −1.6 kN at a frequency of 0.5 Hz for 50000 cycles. Measurements of the micromotion and migration were carried out using two linear variable differential transducers and the strain on the cortex of the femur was measured by a digital image correlation system (Limess Messtechnik & Software Gmbh).

A three-dimensional model was generated from computed tomography scans of the implanted Sawbone and converted to a finite element (FE) model using Simple-ware software (Simpleware Ltd, Exeter, UK). Face-to-face elements were used to generate a contact pair between the Sawbone and the implant. A contact stiffness of 6000 N/m and a friction coefficient of 0.3 were assigned. The analysis simulated a load of −1.6 kN applied to the head of the implant shortly post implantation. The motions and strains recorded in the experiment were compared with the predictions from the computational model. The micromotion (the vertical movement of the implant during a single load cycle), was measured at the proximal shoulder, at the distal tip of the implant and at the bone-implant interface. The maximum value calculated proximally using FE was 61.3 μm compared to the experimental value of 59.6 μm. At the distal end, the maximum micromotion from FE was 168.9 μm compared to 170 μm experimentally. As a point of reference, some authors have suggested that in vivo, fibrous tissue formation may take place at the bone-implant interface when the micromotion is above 150 μm. The maximum micromotion found computationally at this interface was 99 μm which is below the threshold value defined. The longitudinal strain over the surface of the bone was variable and reached values of up to 0.15% computationally and 0.4% experimentally; this may be related to the coordinate systems used. However, it was noted that digital image correlation identified qualitatively similar strain patterns, and has great potential for measuring low level surface strains on bone.

In conclusion, the good correlation between the computational modelling and experimental tests provides confidence in the model for further investigations using probabilistic analyses where more complex configurations (for example change in implant alignment) can be analyzed.

Correspondence should be addressed to Diane Przepiorski at ISTA, PO Box 6564, Auburn, CA 95604, USA. Phone: +1 916-454-9884; Fax: +1 916-454-9882; E-mail: ista@pacbell.net