header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

A790. REVISION TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY WITH A MODULAR TAPERED DISTAL FIXATION STEM: A FIVE TO TEN-YEAR FOLLOW-UP



Abstract

As the proximal femoral bone is generally compromised in failed hip arthroplasty, achievement of solid fixation with a new component can be technically demanding. Recent studies have demonstrated good short-term clinical results after revision total hip arthroplasty using modular distal fixation stems, but, to our knowledge, none have included clinical follow-up of greater than 5 years. The purpose of this study was to report the clinical and radiographic outcomes assessed 5 to 10 years following revision total hip arthroplasty with a modular tapered distal fixation stem.

We retrospectively evaluated 50 revision total hip arthroplasties performed using a modular tapered distal fixation stem Between December 1998 and November 2003. There were 15 men (16 hips) and 34 women (34 hips) with a mean age of 59 years (range, 36 to 80 years). The index operation was the first femoral revision for 46 hips, the second for 3 hips, and the fifth for 1 hip. According to the Paprosky classification, 5 femoral defects were Type II, 31 were Type IIIA, and 14 were Type IIIB. An extended trochanteric osteotomy was carried out in 24 (48%) of the 50 hips. Patients were followed both clinically and radiographically for a mean of 7.2 years.

The mean Harris hip score improved from 54 points preoperatively to 94 points at the time of the latest follow-up. The mean stem subsidence was 1.5mm. Three stems subsided more than 5 mm, but all have stabilized in their new positions. During follow-up, a total of 4 hips required additional surgery. One hip had two-stage re-revision due to deep infection, one had liner and head exchange for alumina ceramic head fracture, and the other two underwent isolated cup re-revision because of aseptic cup loosening and recurrent dislocation, respectively. No repeat revision was performed due to aseptic loosening of the femoral component. Complications included 6% intraoperative fractures, 4% cortical perforations, and 4% dislocations. There were no stem fractures at the modular junction.

The medium-term clinical results and mechanical stability obtained with this modular tapered distal fixation stem were excellent in these challenging revision situations with femoral bone defects.

Correspondence should be addressed to Diane Przepiorski at ISTA, PO Box 6564, Auburn, CA 95604, USA. Phone: +1 916-454-9884; Fax: +1 916-454-9882; E-mail: ista@pacbell.net