THE FEMORAL MECHANICAL-ANATOMICAL ANGLE AND THE PREOPERATIVE VARUS – VALGUS LIMB ALIGNMENT: X-RAY ANALYSIS OF 174 HIP-KNEE-ANKLE FILMS

Abstract

Many studies have already been published to prove the improved accuracy in achieving the ideal post-operative long leg alignment when using computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Surgeons who use traditional instrumentation with a fixed distal femoral resection angle (most commonly 6°) assume little or no variation in the angle between the anatomical and mechanical axis of the femur (FMA angle) in different patients.

The aims of this study were to investigate the distribution of the FMA angle in pathological knees of patients about to undergo TKA and to analyse if there was any correlation between the FMA angle and the pre-operative lower limb alignment in the coronal plane (varus or valgus).

The study consisted of 158 consecutive patients undergoing 174 primary TKA between January and October 2007. All patients had pre-operative digital Hip-Knee-Ankle radiographs. The FMA angle and the mechanical femorotibial angle (MFT angle) were measured in all cases. Intra- and inter-observer variation was measured by second observer readings and repeated measurements.

The mean age of the study cohort was 69.9 years (SD 8.7 years). There were 75 male and 99 female knees. The repeatability for measurement of the FMA angle was good (intra-observer Intra Correlation Coefficient (ICC) = 0.91, inter-observer ICC = 0.85) and for the measurement of MFT angle was very good (intra-observer ICC = 0.99, inter-observer ICC = 0.99). There were 135 knees with a varus or neutral alignment and 39 knees with valgus alignment. The median alignment was 6.5° varus ranging from 23° varus to 16° valgus. The FMA angle was between 2° and 9°, with a median of 6°. The FMA angle was 6° in 35.4% of cases, 5° in 22.9% and 7° in 18.3%. There was a statistical significant correlation between the FMA angle and the pre-operative lower limb alignment (Pearson correlation coefficient = −0.5, p < 0.001), with valgus knees having on average a lower FMA angle. The group of females and males had statistically different FMA angles (Mann-Whitney, p < 0.001) with females having on average a lower FMA angle. Cluster analysis based on the original clinical definitions of severe varus, varus and valgus gave three groups of FMA angle for MFT angle < 8° varus, MFT angle of 8° varus to 1° valgus and MFT angle > 1° valgus. There was a statistically significant difference in median FMA angle between these three groups (Kruskal-Wallis, p < 0.001).

This study indicates that one of the main reasons why optimal post-operative coronal alignment cannot be achieved with a fixed distal femoral resection angle is the fact that the FMA angle has a wide, natural distribution. It is possible that better results may be achieved with traditional instrumentation by individual measurement of FMA angle for each patient pre-operatively and adjusting the distal femoral resection to account for this. However, with computer navigation the distal femoral cut is adjusted for each patient.