header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

S12.3 CHRONIC OSTEITIS OF THE TIBIA AFTER OPEN VERSUS NON OPEN TIBIAL FRACTURES: DIFFERENCES IN TREATMENT AND THE RATE OF RECURRENCE



Abstract

Objectives: An osteitis of the tibia remains a major problem especially in cases of open tibial fractures. A successful therapy management goes along with a radical bacterial eradication, sufficient soft tissue coverage, and a stable osseous reconstruction.

Methods: The study population consists of 112 patients (53 ± 13 years). All of them suffered from a tibial osteitis after fracture of the tibia. The study population was divided in patients with osteitis after open versus non open tibial fracture. The therapy strategy was the same in both groups. It was done according to a standardised treatment plan including radical surgical eradication of infectious and necrotic tissue, programmed lavage with vacuum sealing in combination with an effective bacterial antibiotic therapy. Surgical stabilization was done in cases of instability. Final osseous reconstruction and soft tissue coverage was performed if necessary after three negative intraoperative smears.

Results: 89 patients of the patients (79%) suffered form open tibial fractures versus 23 (21%) patients with non open fractures (NOF). The average inpatient treatment time was 13 ± 18 weeks in cases of osteitis after open tibial fractures and 8 ± 4 weeks after NOF. The average number of operative procedures after open fractures vs NOF was 10 ± 7 vs 8 ± 4. In 55 patients a muscle flap procedure was performed after open tibial fractures (53%) versus 9 (26%) after NOF. An amputation of the lower leg had to be done in 5 patients after open tibial fractures (5%) versus in 2 patients after NOF (6%). The rate of bacterial eradication with no recurrence of infection for at least one year was 53% in cases of osteitis after open tibial fracture and 65% after NOF.

Conclusion: An open fracture of the tibia is a major risk factor for developing a chronic osteitis. The eradication of bacterial infections takes a longer time and more operative procedures are necessary in cases of open tibial fractures versus closed fractures. In cases of open fractures there exists a higher need of soft tissue reconstruction by muscle flaps. After eradication there are no significant differences in the one year recurrence rate.

Correspondence should be addressed to Vienna Medical Academy, Alser Strasse 4, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. Phone: +43 1 4051383 0, Fax: +43 1 4078274, Email: ebjis2009@medacad.org