header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

PAIN FOLLOWING SURGICALLY TREATED DISPLACED PELVIC RING INJURIES



Abstract

Aims: To determine the incidence and pattern of pain in patients with displaced pelvic ring injuries treated surgically. To investigate the link between pain and neurological injury.

Methods: All patients with pelvic ring fractures treated surgically were contacted by a postal questionnaire. Assessment was made from validated pain scores, pain maps, a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and correlated with outcome scores including SF36 and Euroqol. Injuries were classified using the Young and Burgess (YB) classification.

Results: There was a response rate of 85% (151 of 178 patients). Average age at injury was 40 yrs (16–74 yrs). Average follow up was 5.3yrs (1–12 yrs). 72% were male. There were 31% Antero-Posterior Compression (APC) injuries, 37% Lateral Compression (LC) injuries and 32% Vertical Shear (VS) injuries. 76% of all patients reported activity related pain; 70% of APC, 73% of LC and 86% of VS injuries (p=0.05, Chi-squared test). These results correlated directly with the pain domain of the Euroqol tool. There were however no statistically significant differences in the interference of pain with work (SF36) or the VAS between injury classes. There was a 15% prevalence of neurological injury in the cohort (9% of APC, 11% of LC and 27% of VS injuries; p=0.03 Chi-squared test). There were no statistically significant differences in the prevalence of moderate to severe pain (Euroqol) or the VAS between those with and without significant neurological injury. The presence of neurological injury significantly affected return to employment but not return to sports or social activities.

Conclusions: These results illustrate the prevalence of significant morbidity in patients with surgically treated pelvic ring fractures. Presence of pain could be linked to injury category but a link with neurological injury was not obvious. This can help give prognostic information to patients suffering displaced pelvic ring injuries requiring surgical reconstruction.


Correspondence should be sent to Mr Adekoyejo A Odutola, North Bristol NHS Trust, Frenchay Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom, koye@doctors.org.uk

The abstracts were prepared by Mr Matt Costa and Mr Ben Ollivere. Correspondence should be addressed to Mr Costa at Clinical Sciences Research Institute, University of Warwick, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry CV2 2DX, UK.