header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

182. A COMPARISON OF COMPLICATION RATES AND OUTCOMES FOLLOWING LIMB-LENGTHENING FOR POST-TRAUMATIC VERSUS CONGENITAL/DEVELOPMENTAL DEFORMITY



Abstract

Purpose: To conduct a study to identify differences in complication rates and outcomes between previously recognized sub-groups commonly treated for limb length discrepancies (LLD).

Method: Forty-two males and 13 females were treated for LLD at two level-one trauma centres. Mean LLD was 4.4 cm (range 1.8 to 18cm). There were 44 femoral segments (in 41 patients) and 14 tibia segments lengthened. Forty were post-traumatic, and 18 congenital/ developmental. Objective data regarding complications, length achieved, and lengthening duration was collected from patient records. Two groups were compared for differences: Developmental (congenital and developmental etiology combined; LLD occurred prior to skeletal maturity and treatment involved creating new length) versus post-traumatic (restoration of previously existing length), and tibia versus femoral lengthening.

Results: A mean of 4.4 cm of length was achieved over a mean duration of 83 days, for a mean lengthening index of 18.9 days/cm. Superficial pin tract infections were the most common complication, occurring in 33 segments (56%). Deep infection occurred in six segments (10%). Three of these six had a history of open fracture, and a fourth had a history of infection during initial fracture management. All were successfully treated with irrigation and debridement, and exchange nailing. The developmental group had significantly greater incidence of flexion contracture (13% versus 78%, p< 0.001), and surgical correction for a contracture deformity (5% versus 61%, p< 0.001). The post-traumatic group had a significantly higher rate of painful hardware requiring removal following successful treatment of their LLD (45% versus 16%, p=0.04). Tibia segments had a significantly greater lengthening index (29 d/cm versus 18 d/cm, p=0.03).

Conclusion: Limb lengthening is an involved process with potential for serious complications. Patients who had limb-lengthening for congenital/ developmental discrepancies had a higher rate of adjacent joint contrac-ture and subsequent requirement for surgical release. Patients with post-traumatic lengthening had a higher rate of hardware removal, and the lengthening index was greater for tibiae than femora. Deep infection remains a significant concern. This study provides information for physicians and patients on the rate and type of complications that can be expected both overall, and within specific LLD treatment groups.

Correspondence should be addressed to CEO Doug C. Thomson. Email: doug@canorth.org