header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

17. USE OF CO-REGISTERED HIGH-RESOLUTION COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANS BEFORE AND AFTER SCREW INSERTION AS A NOVEL TECHNIQUE FOR BONE MINERAL DENSITY DETERMINATION ALONG SCREW TRAJECTORY



Abstract

Purpose: Bone mineral density (BMD) is an important factor in the performance of orthopaedic instrumentation both in and ex-vivo, and until now, there has not existed a reliable technique for determining BMD at the precise location of such hardware. This paper describes such a technique using cadaveric human sacra as a model.

Method: Nine fresh-frozen sacra had solid and hollow titanium screw placed into the S1 pedicles from a posterior approach. High-resolution micro-computed tomography (CT) was performed on each specimen before and after screw placement. All images were reconstructed with an isotropic spatial resolution of 0.308 mm, reoriented, and the pre-screw and post-screw scans were registered and transformed using a six-degree rigid-body transformation matrix. Once registered, two points, corresponding to the center of the screw at the cortex and at the screw tip, were determined in each scan. These points were used to generate cylindrical regions of interest (ROI) with the same trajectory and dimensions as the screw. BMD measurements were obtained within each of the ROI in the pre-screw scan. To examine the effect of artefact on BMD measurements around the titanium screws, annular ROI of 1 mm thickness were created expanding from the surface of the screws, and BMD was measured within each in both the pre-and post-screw scans.

Results: The registration process was accurate, with an error of 0.2 mm. Four specimens were scanned five times with repositioning, and error in BMD measurements was ± 2%. BMD values in the cylindrical ROI corresponding to screw trajectories were not statistically different from side to side of each specimen (p = 0.23). Artefact-related differences in BMD values followed an exponential decay curve as distance from the screws increased, approaching a low value of approximately 20 mg HA/cc, but not disappearing completely.

Conclusion: CT in the presence of metal creates artefact, making measured BMD values near implants unreliable. This technique is accurate for determination of BMD, non-destructive, and eliminates the problem of this metal artefact through the use of co-registration of a pre- and post-screw scan. This technique has applications both in-vitro and in-vivo.

Correspondence should be addressed to CEO Doug C. Thomson. Email: doug@canorth.org