header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

DOUBLE ROD ANTERIOR RECONSTRUCTION IN TUMOUR, FRACTURE, INFECTION: UNIQUE USE OF NON-LINKED STANDARD SPINAL IMPLANTS



Abstract

We performed a retrospective follow-up study investigating the safety and efficacy of an independently constructed non-linked double rod system for anterior column reconstruction.

Our objective was to demonstrate safe and cost effective adaptation of a standard deformity system for use in anterior column reconstruction.

Anterior only surgery in patients requiring corporectomy spares the posterior soft tissue envelope. Corporectomy and neural decompression is followed by insertion of a titanium mesh cage and bone graft. Several non-adaptable implant systems (locking plates and linked-rod constructs) have been validated both in clinical and in-vitro studies and are available to the surgeon. These devices can only be used to address the anterior column and can only span a limited number of spinal segments.

Twenty-two patients have undergone anterior column reconstruction for tumour (8), trauma (11) and infection (3) in our unit are included. Mean follow up was 30.5 months. All had anterior corporectomy and decompression, insertion of a titanium mesh cage and stabilisation with an anterior non-linked dual rod construct (Synthes USS II). Follow-up records and radiographs have been analysed.

Ninety-five percent of patients fused clinically and radiologically on plain radiograph examination. There was no failure of metalwork or deterioration in neurological function following surgery. There were 5 deaths in the study group, 4 from progression of metastatic malignant tumour and one within 30 days of surgery. Three patients have had local malignant disease recurrence, two requiring posterior decompression and one requiring further anterior surgery.

This system is effective and safe. It allows fewer implants to be carried by individual hospitals and thus reduces hospital costs.

Correspondence should be addressed to Editorial Secretary Mr ML Costa or Assistant Editorial Secretary Mr B.J. Ollivere at BOA, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE, England; Email: mattcosta@hotmail.com or ben@ollivere.co.uk