header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF HUMAN FLEXOR HALLUCIS LONGUS, PERONEUS BREVIS AND TENDO ACHILLES TENDONS



Abstract

Repair of chronic Achilles tendon rupture is technically complex. Flexor jallucis longus (FHL) and peroneus brevis (PB) tendon transfers have been described, but the mechanical properties of these tissues have not been well reported.

The FHL, PB and tendo achilles (TA) tendons were harvested from 17 fresh frozen human cadavers free of gross pathology (mean age 69 years). Samples were tested in uniaxial tension at 100% per minute. Samples were secured using special jigs for the bony aspect or by freezing the tendons in cryogrips using liquid carbon dioxide. The peak load (N), linear stiffness (N/mm) and energy to peak load (N*mm) were determined. Mechanical data was analysed using one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a Games Howell multiple comparison post-hoc test.

Fifty one tendons were harvested and mechanical testing was successfully completed in all samples apart from one PB that slipped from the grips during testing (sample was omitted from the analysis). The mean ultimate loads differed for each group, with the TA tendons being the strongest (1724.5 N ± 514.3) followed by FHL (511.0 N ± 164.3) and PB (333.1 N ± 137.2) (P< 0.05). Similar results were found with respect to energy, with TA tendons absorbing the most energy followed by FHL and PB (P< 0.05). Stiffness for the TA tendons (175.5 N/mm ± 94.8) was greater than FHL (43.3 N/mm ± 14.1) and PB (43.6 N/mm ± 18.9), which did not differ from each other.

FHL is stronger than PB, but have similar stiffness. The mechanical properties of PB and FHL were both inferior to TA. Graft stiffness appears to be an important variable rather than ultimate load based on the clinical success of both techniques.

Correspondence should be addressed to Editorial Secretary Mr ML Costa or Assistant Editorial Secretary Mr B.J. Ollivere at BOA, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE, England; Email: mattcosta@hotmail.com or ben@ollivere.co.uk