header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

EFFECT OF TOTAL ANKLE REPLACEMENT ON BONE MINERAL DENSITY AROUND THE ANKLE



Abstract

There is limited literature available looking into circumstances surrounding the development of stress fracture of the medial and lateral malleoli after ankle replacement. We present the preliminary results of a prospective study examining the effect of ankle replacement upon local bone mineral density and the phenomenon of stress shielding.

We aimed to assess the effect of ankle replacement loading of the medial and lateral malleoli, by analysing the Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the medial and lateral malleoli before and after Mobility total ankle replacement.

Ten consecutive patients undergoing Mobility total ankle replacement for osteoarthritis had pre-operative bone densitometry scans of the ankle, repeated at 6 months after surgery. The bone mineral density of a 2 cm square area within the medial malleolus and lateral malleolus was measured. The pre-operative and postoperative bone densitometry scans were compared. The relation between the alignment of the tibial component and the bone mineral density of the malleoli was also analysed.

The mean preoperative BMD within the medial malleolus improved from 0.57g/cm2 to mean 6 months postoperative BMD of 0.62g/cm2. The mean preoperative BMD within the lateral malleolus decreased from 0.39g/cm2 to a mean 6 months postoperative of 0.33g/cm2. The mean alignment of the tibial component was 88.50 varus (range 850 varus to 940 valgus). However, there was no correlation between the alignment of the tibial component and the bone mineral density on the medial malleolus (r = 0.09, p = 0.865).

The absence of stress shielding around the medial malleolus indicates that ankle replacements implanted within the accepted limits for implant alignment, load the medial malleolus. However, there was stress shielding over the lateral malleolus resulting in decreased BMD in the lateral malleolus.

Correspondence should be addressed to Editorial Secretary Mr ML Costa or Assistant Editorial Secretary Mr B.J. Ollivere at BOA, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE, England; Email: mattcosta@hotmail.com or ben@ollivere.co.uk