header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

GIANT CELL TUMOR OF THE DISTAL RADIUS – FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION AFTER EN BLOC RESECTION



Abstract

Introduction: Giant cell tumor of bone is a semimaligne tumor which locally recurs very often but rarely metastasises. En bloc resection of the distal radius with reconstruction using a homologeous allograft, curettage with PMMA blomb, and allograft arthrodesis are established methods. The aim of the study was to evaluate the functional outcome of our patients with the DASH-Score and the Mayo Wrist Score

Materials and Methods: In the last 7 years six patients were treated at our clinic due to a giant cell tumor of the distal radius. Two patients were primary treated with an en bloc resection. The other four were primary treated with curettage and filled up with PMMA cement plomb (Phenol was used in every case). In two of these cases a secondary en bloc resection was performed for local recurrence. For evaluation of function in daily live we used the DASH Score and the MAYO wrist score.

Results: The mean bone resection length was 5,25cm (5–6 cm).

All four patients treated with en bloc resection (primary or secondary) had no recurrence but in two out of that cases a re-operation was necessary because of non union.

At a mean follow up from 27 months (4–95) there were no recurrences or metastases at all

The flexion/extension of the wrist in currettaged radius was 60° and 80° compared with 38° and 68° in reconstructed radius. The pronation/suppination was 90°/90° in the currettaged ones versus 77°/77° in the allograft replaced ones.

The functional outcome evaluated with Mayo Wrist Score and DASH score showed an exellent outcome for both groups (84/7,7 Allograft < -> 85/10 Currettage)

Discussion: Functional outcome of distal radius resection reconstruction using an allograft is highly satisfactory compared with the literature, however we experienced a high risk for pseudoarthrosis. For prevention of non union simultan bone grafting at the index operation could be advisable.

The functional outcome proof no disadvantages in daily life and daily work compared to curettage. Thus allograft reconstruction of the distal radius represents a valuable alternative to arthrodesis.

Correspondence should be addressed to: EFORT Central Office, Technoparkstrasse 1, CH – 8005 Zürich, Switzerland. Email: office@efort.org