EQUIVALENT RESULTS IN REPAIRING OR NOT A TYPE II SLAP LESION WHEN ASSOCIATED WITH ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR IN PATIENTS OVER 50.

Abstract

Several studies showed the efficacy of arthroscopic repair for Type II SLAP lesions without other associated lesions, but the only data reported on the association of arthroscopic repair of Type II SLAP lesion and rotator cuff tears involve young and active patient. To our knowledge, no studies have focused on patients over 50.

We evaluated the results of a randomized controlled trial of arthroscopic repair in patients over 50 with rotator cuff tears and Type II SLAP lesion in whom the repair was effected repairing the two lesions, or repairing the rotator cuff tears and performing a tenotomy of the long head of the biceps.

We recruited 63 patients. In 31 patients, we repaired the rotator cuff and the Type II SLAP lesion (Group 1). In the other 32 patients, we repaired the rotator cuff and tenotomized the long head of the biceps (Group 2). 7 patients (2 in the group 1 and 5 in the group 2) were lost to final follow up.

A modified UCLA shoulder rating scale was used to evaluate pre-operative and post-operative shoulder pain, function, active forward flexion, strength and patient satisfaction.

Of 63 patients randomized to one of the two treatments, 5.2 year results were available for 56. 7 patients (2 in the group 1 and 5 in the group 2) did not return at the final follow up.

Statistically significant differences were seen with respect to the UCLA score and ROM values at final follow-up In Group 1 (SLAP repair and rotator cuff repair), the UCLA showed a statistically significant improvement from a pre-operative average rating of 10.4 (range 6 to 14) to an average of 27.9 (24–35) postoperatively (P< 0.001). In Group 2 (biceps tenotomy and rotator cuff repair), the UCLA showed a statistically significant improvement from a pre-operative average rating of 10.1 (range 5 to 14) to an average of 32.1 (range 30 to 35) post-operatively (P< 0.001) There was statistically significant difference in total post-operative UCLA scores and ROM when comparing the two groups post-operatively (P< 0.05).

Arthroscopic management has been recommended for some SLAP lesions, but no studies have focused on patients over 50 with rotator cuff tear and Type II SLAP lesion.

We compared the clinical outcome of patients over 50 affected with rotator cuff tears and Type II SLAP lesion in whom both the defects were repaired, or the rotator cuff tear was repaired and the long head of the biceps tendon was tenotomized. In our hands, the association of rotator cuff repair and biceps tenotomy provides better clinical outcome compared with repair of Type II SLAP lesion and of the rotator cuff.

The repair of the two defects, in fact, can lead to worst clinical results compared with association Rotator cuff repair alone is sufficient to determine a good post-operative outcome, allowing to avoid post-operative stiffness of the shoulder.