REVASCULARIZATION MODALITIES IN OSTEONECROSIS OF THE FEMORAL HEAD: VASCULARIZED FIBULAR GRAFT VS POROUS TANTALUM IMPLANT

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological findings in patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head after management with vascularized fibular graft (VFG) compared to porous tantalum implant.

The study included 60 hips in 50 patients, who were followed prospectively for 2–4 years. 28 patients (30 hips) were treated with VFG and 22 patients (30 hips) were treated with a porous tantalum implant. The two patient groups were matched for age, gender, etiology, pre-operative stage and Harris Hip Score (HHS). Of the VFG group, 14 hips were stage II and 16 were stage III, while of the tantalum group, 1 hip was stage I, 11 hips were stage II and 18 hips were stage III, according to Steinberg classification system. Mean operative time was 3 hours for VFG and 30 min for porous tantalum.

At final follow-up, there was no significant statistical difference in the radiological stage (p=0.246), and radiological progression of the disease (p=0.329) was observed between these two groups. Using HHS, the mean clinical results improved in the VFG group from 61 points preoperatively to 90 points at final follow-up, while in tantalum group HHS improved from 63 to 81 points (p=0.022). Three hips from each group underwent total hip arthroplasty.

The results of the present study suggest that although the management of AVN with VFG appears to show better results compared to the use of porous tantalum using clinical evaluation Methods: (eg HHS), further controlled studies with larger patient groups and longer follow-up are required.