header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

RESULTS OF A SURVEY OF THE USE OF SCIATIC NERVE BLOCKS AMONGST FOOT AND ANKLE SURGEONS IN NORTH AMERICA AND THE UK



Abstract

Introduction: Sciatic nerve blocks have been used to reduce post-operative analgesia and allow early discharge for patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery. This study aims to identify utilisation of this procedure and to ascertain if there is a consensus amongst surgeons as to best practise with regards to who performs the block and how it is performed.

Method: We surveyed current committee members of the American and members of the British orthopaedic foot and ankle surgery societies (AOFAS and BOFAS).

Results: More than half of those who responded perform over 90% foot and ankle surgery. 77% performed sciatic nerve blockade through the popliteal approach (26% used the subgluteal approach). The most common position was supine with 80% being performed by the anaesthetist. 45% never used ultrasonography to detect the position of the nerve and variable levels of nerve stimulation were used. 30% used an infusion catheter with 20% allowing discharge to home with the catheter. 42% of surgeons where happy to have the block performed under full anaesthesia. The commonest complication cited was prolonged anaesthesia, the majority of which resolved. Performing the block awake or sedated did not seem to alter the number of complications seen.

Discussion: This study represents a current practice review of sciatic nerve blocks performed in foot and ankle surgery and shows a variety of techniques used. Although this is now a widely used block, no consensus has been reached as to the use of ultrasound, level of nerve stimulation or whether the patient needs to be awake for the procedure. The use of infusion catheters (especially after discharge) has not been widely utilised, especially amongst UK surgeons.

Correspondence should be addressed to A.H.N. Robinson, BOX 37, Department of Orthopaedics, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge. CB2 0QQ, England.