header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

AN 8 YEAR AUDIT OF OUTCOMES OF OPERATIVE AND NON-OPERATIVE TREATMENT OF ACHILLES TENDON RUPTURE USING IDENTICAL REHABILITATION GUIDELINES.



Abstract

In January 2000 we introduced identical guidelines for the more rapid rehabilitation of Achilles tendon ruptures, whether treated operatively or non-operatively. A relaxed equinus cast was used to four weeks, then a CAM walker to eight weeks with supervised mobilisation. The aims of this study were to compare the outcomes of the operative and non-operative groups treated with the same rehabilitation program and audit the effectiveness of these guidelines.

The audit was retrospective from January 2000 till January 2008. The patients were identified from the Emergency Department admissions database, the hospital clinical coding system, the department’s surgical audit data and the hospital physiotherapy appointment system. The audit system was used to identify patients that had complications of their operative treatment, re-ruptures or readmissions. This study focused on the end points of re-rupture, readmission, complications including wound complications and infection.

Five hundred and eighty seven presentations were recorded as Achilles tendon injuries. One hundred and eighty patients were treated operatively and 407 patients were treated conservatively. Seventy five patients (42%) treated operatively and 126 patients (30%) of the non-operative group were rehabilitated in our hospital physiotherapy department. The remaining 386 patients (65.7% of all patients) received physiotherapy elsewhere or did not attend for further treatment. In the operative group there were two re-ruptures (1.1%) both treated in our hospital physiotherapy department. There were 2 wound complications (1.1%), one requiring re-operation. In the non operative group there were 15 re-ruptures (3.7%). Of these three had attended the hospital physiotherapy department (rerupture rate of 2.4%) In the non-operative group treated elsewhere there were 12 re-ruptures from 281 patients (4.2%).

Comparable results were found between operative and non-operative treatment when combined with close physiotherapy guidance. Non-operatively treated patients treated in the community may have higher re-rupture rates. The results are comparable to those in the literature suggesting that the guidelines are effective.

Correspondence should be addressed to Associate Professor N. Susan Stott, Orthopaedic Department, Starship Children’s Hospital, Private Bag 92024, Auckland, New Zealand.