header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

OR11: QUANTIFYING SURGICAL TECHNIQUE IN ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES WITH A COMPUTERIZED SURGICAL TRAINING SYSTEM



Abstract

Introduction: Most surgeons agree on basic parameters defining a successful joint replacement procedure. However, the process of acquiring the skills to achieve this level of success on a reproducible basis is much less straightforward. In reality, it is generally not possible to impart surgical training without some level of risk to the patient, particularly if a particular trainee or procedure has a long learning curve. In an attempt to address these issues, we have developed a new computer-based training system to measure the technical results of hip and knee replacement surgery in both the operating room and the Bioskills Lab.

Description of the System: This system utilizes Surgical Navigation technology combined with data analysis and display routines to monitor the position and alignment of instruments and implants during the procedure in comparison with a preoperative plan. For bioskills training, the surgeon develops a preoperative plan on a computer workstation using accurate 3D computer models of the bones and appropriate implants. The surgeon then performs the entire procedure using the cadaver or sawbone model. During the procedure, the position and orientation of the bones, each surgical instrument, and the trial components are measured with a three-dimensional motion analysis system. Through analysis of this data, the surgeon is able to view each step of the surgical procedure, the placement of each instrument with respect to each bone, and the consequences of each surgical decision in terms of the final placement of the prosthetic components When errors are detected in the implementation of the preoperative plan, the surgeon is able to replay each step of the procedure to examine the precise placement of each instrument with respect to each bone and the consequences of each surgical decision in terms of leg length, alignment and range-of-motion.

Conclusions: This system allows us to measure the technical success of a surgical procedure in terms of quantifiable geometric, spatial, kinematic or kinetic parameters. It also provides postoperative feedback to the surgeon by demonstrating the specific contributions of each step of the surgical procedure to deviations in final alignment or soft tissue instability. This approach allows surgeons to be trained outside the operating room prior to patient exposure. Once these skills have been developed, the surgeon is able to operate freely in the operating room without the risks associated with traditional surgical training, or the expense associated with intraoperative Surgical Navigation. The value of this approach in the training and accreditation of orthopedic staff warrants further investigation.

The abstracts were prepared by David AF Morgan. Correspondence should be addressed to him at davidafmorgan@aoa.org.au