header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

KS46: A COMPARISON OF COGNITIVE DECLINE FOLLOWING TOTAL HIP, CONVENTIONAL TOTAL KNEE AND NAVIGATED KNEE ARTHROPLASTY



Abstract

Cognitive dysfunction has been well documented following total knee replacement. Possible causes that have been postulated include cerebral emboli, post-operative complications and pain. The aim of this study is to compare cognitive decline in patients undergoing conventional total knee replacement (TKR), navigated total knee replacement and total hip replacement (THR).

We prospectively analysed 75 patients undergoing lower limb arthroplasty. Group 1 consisted of 25 conventional TKR’s, group 2 consisted of 25 navigated TKR’s and group 3 consisted of 25 THR’s. Cognitive function was assessed by 11 validated neuropsychological tests preoperatively, at 1 week post-operatively and at 6 months post-operatively. Testing was carried out by a clinical psychologist.

At day 6 post-operatively 55% of group 1, 83% of group 2 and 61% of group 3 patients had a significant cognitive decline. Group 2 had a significantly greater cognitive decline at day 6 compared to the other 2 groups. At 6 months significant cognitive decline was found in all 3 groups to 21%, 16% and 34% respectively. Group 2 demonstrated the greatest improvement in cognition from day 6 to 6 months post-operatively

Significant cognitive decline occurs in two-thirds (66%) of all patients undergoing lower limb arthroplasty at day 6 and remains significant in a quarter (25%) of patients at 6 months. There was no significant difference in cognitive decline in patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty.

The abstracts were prepared by David AF Morgan. Correspondence should be addressed to him at davidafmorgan@aoa.org.au

Declaration of interest: c – In relation to the conduct of this study, one or more the authors have received, or are likely to receive direct material benefits.