IS AUTOLOGOUS DRAINAGE BLOOD REINFUSION ADVANTAGEOUS OVER NO DRAIN IN PRIMARY TKA?

Abstract

Primary total knee arthroplasty is associated with considerable blood loss, and allergenic blood transfusions are frequently necessary. Because of the cost and risks of allogenic blood transfusions, the autologous drainage blood reinfusion technique has been developed as an alternative. A number of studies have compared reinfusion techniques with standard suction drainage, but few reports compared with no drain use. We analyzed early results after primary total knee arthroplasty using autologous drainage blood reinfusion and no drain.

We selected 30 patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty using no drain between November 2005 and March 2006 and matched for age and gender with 30 patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty using autologous drainage blood reinfusion technique between January 2003 and October 2005. All operations were done under pneumatic tourniquet and meticulous hemostasis was performed after deflation of the tourniquet. We have retrospectively reviewed the preoperative data (age, gender, body mass index, diagnosis, history of the knee surgery, infection and anticoagulant therapy, and medical cormorbidities) and the postoperative data (hemoglobin, hematocrit and platelet during hospitalization, the amount of allogenic blood transfusion and narcotics, complications, rehabilitation process, and clinical scores).

All preoperative and postoperative variables except the postoperative second and seventh days hemoglobin and 2nd day hematocrit showed no significant differences between two groups. The hemoglobin and hematocrit also showed no significant differences at the postoperative fourteenth day.

The autologous drainage blood reinfusion method in primary total knee arthroplasty does not have significant clinical benefit over no-drain method with regards to allogenic blood transfusions, narcotics uses, the incidence of complications and rehabilitation processes.