header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

BONE MENERAL DENSITY IN LUMBAR VERTEBRA AFTER UNCEMENTED HIP ARTHROPLASTY FOR DYSPLASTIC OSTEOARTHRITIS



Abstract

Considerable numbers of authors have reported the change in periprothetic bone mineral density (BMD) after hip arthroplasty. However, there have been few reports concerning the BMD in the lumbar vertebra, especially for dysplastic hips.

Since 1998, we have been measuring the BMD mineral density for 2016 patients by DXA (Dual-energy X-Ray Absorptionmetry method). Among them, we evaluated the BMD in 66 postmenopausal patients with the single side primary arthroplasty, with five years or more follow-up, and also aged 60 or more. We used a DXA densitometer (DPX-IQ, GE Healthcare, Madison, WI, USA). The diagnosis at the surgery was dysplastic osteoarthritis in all patients. The average age at the surgery was 66 (60–81). All patients were female. No patients had the systematic diseases which contributed to the secondary osteoporosis. No patients had received the pharmacotherapy for osteoporosis in the whole therapeutic process. The bed rest was seven from two days after the surgery (different by the operation date). The average follow-up was 7.0 (five to ten) years.

The average BMD in the lumbar vertebra before the surgery was 0.996 (0.612 to 1.712) g/cm2. The BMD was 0.971 (0.637 to 1.402) at six month postoperatively, 0.972 (0.552 to 1.740) at one year, 1.004 (0.573 to 1.733) at two years, 1.032 (0.633 to 1.670) at three years, 1.035(0.724 to 1.688) at four years, 1.031 (0.564 to 1.679) at five years, 1.027 (0.734 to 1.647) at six years, 1.042 (0.589 to 1.389) at seven years. At the final follow-up, the BMD was 1.054 (0.589 to 1.647). In 53 patients (80%), the density at the final follow-up increased in comparison to that before the surgery. In 27 patients (41%), the density once decreased six month postoperatively. The density increased at 3 years (t=−1.919, p=0.030), four years (t=−2.523, p=0.015), five years (t=−2.381, p=0.021), seven years (t=−2.822, p=0,007), and at the final-follow-up (−4.076, p= 0.000) in comparison to that before the surgery. The activity of the patients was evaluated by the hip score. The average score was 54.5 (21 to 76) before the surgery. The average score was 88.0 (66 to 100) and increased at the final follow-up in comparison to that before the surgery (t=−13.04, p 0.000).

Some authors (eg. Bergström I, 2008, Espar I, 2008, etc.) have pointed out that the appropriate activity may increase the bone density. Presumed from the literatures, the increase of activity after the arthroplasty may have increased the BMD, though the direct correlation was not obvious between the BMD and the amount of hip score (at the final follow-up: r=0.005, p=0.972) in this study.

Correspondence should be addressed to ISTA Secretariat, PO Box 6564, Auburn, CA 95604, USA. Tel: 1-916-454-9884, Fax: 1-916-454-9882, Email: ista@pacbell.net