header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

ELECTROMAGNETIC NAVIGATION IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY – COMPARISON OF OUR FIRST 100 CASES TO OUR LAST 100 CASES



Abstract

Introduction: Electromagentic Navigation(EM) system has been introduced in total knee arthroplasty to increase the accuracy of lower limb alignment and positioning of the implant. EM navigation systems offer several potential advantages over their infrared counterparts. To our best knowledge, there have been scarce clinical results reported In order to obtain optimal results, a certain period of learning curve may be necessary. We have compared our first 100 cases of total knee arthroplasty to our last 100 cases in order to verify the clinical accuracy, efficacy and learning curve.

Methods: From July 2006 to November 2007, 138 patients underwent 200 serial primary TKA operations by a single surgeon with the assistance of Electromagnetic Navigation system. The 200 TKA cases were divided into two groups; the first 100 and the next 100 cases. We have compared the deviation in postoperative mechanical axis and angles of femoral and tibial component position(α°, β°, and γ°) in addition to the outlier percentage of post-mechanical axis between the two groups. We used the independent sample t-test to verify our results.

Results: The deviation in angle of postoperative mechanical axis was significantly lower in the last group than the first group; 2.0633 vs. 2.6944. (p=0.0145) respectively. The deviation of α° was significantly lower in the last group than the first group; 1.1597 vs. 1.6778. (p=0.005) respectively. The deviation of β ° was lower in the last group than the first group; 1.3475 vs. 1.2115, but this value was not significant. (p=0.849). The results of the value γ° proved to be more towards extension in the first group and more towards flexion in the last group, yet these values were not significant (p=0.159). The outlier percentages of postop-mechanical axis between two groups were significantly different.

Discussion and Conclusion: The navigation system most often used in studies is an optical system with an infrared camera. Many authors have reported the efficacy of optical navigation system. It has been known to increase the accuracy of lower limb alignment and positioning of the implant while decreasing the outlier percentage of postoperative mechanical axis. The large transmitter, however, for this system requires bicortical pins, which would result in stress fracture through the drill-holes in bone. In addition, another skin incision is needed for the transmitter. A new navigation technique using electromagnetic signals has been introduced with advantages including small transmitter size, although its signal is often distorted by metal devices used in the operative field. Our hypothesis was therefore that the EM system could lead to better alignment of the leg and positioning of implants than traditional method with comparable learing curve. In summary, the EM navigation system can lead to better alignment of the mechanical axis of leg and positioning of femoral implants in coronal view compared to conventional method, although it can’t prevent outliers in all case. And also our experience suggests that in order to obtain such results, however, a certain period of learning curve may be necessary. Several valuable surgical tips specific to this technology were obtained enduring our learning curve and will be presented.

Correspondence should be addressed to ISTA Secretariat, PO Box 6564, Auburn, CA 95604, USA. Tel: 1-916-454-9884, Fax: 1-916-454-9882, Email: ista@pacbell.net