Abstract
Improper rotation of the femoral and tibial components in total knee arthroplasty may leads to various patellofemoral(PF) complications. As for the femoral component, alignment it to the epicondylar axis of the femur has been a widely used method. The tibial component traditionally has been aligned to the medial 1/3 of the tibial tuberosity. However, there is no consensus concerning how to determine the tibial component rotation. The purpose of the current study is to evaluate the influence rotational alignment of tibial component upon PF joint. We divided the cases to two groups. Group A: 41cases 50knees (OA 34cases, RA16cases). The average age was 69.5(35~84). Group B: 30cases 30knees (OA 25 cases, RA 5cases). The average age was 72.6(59~86). In group A, the anteropostrior (AP) axis was defined as the line connecting the medial 1/3 of tibial tuberosity and the center of PCL attachment. In group B, the line connecting the medial edge of patellar tendon attachment and the center of PCL attachment was defined as AP axis. We measured the PF alignment on postoperative X-rays. Tangential radiographs were used to measure the amount of patellar tilt (tilting angle: TA), subluxation and patellar lateral shift (LS).
Group A showed that tilting angle 14±4°, lateral shift 0.3±0. These values of group B were 12±5°,0.2±0.1, respectively.
In rotation of tibial component, Insall reported that the landmark in front of tibia was medial 1/3 tibial tuberosity. Akagi et,, al reported that the landmark was midial edge of patellar tendon attachment. This study indicated that the latter had better alignment in patellofemoral joint.
Correspondence should be addressed to ISTA Secretariat, PO Box 6564, Auburn, CA 95604, USA. Tel: 1-916-454-9884, Fax: 1-916-454-9882, Email: ista@pacbell.net
