header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

ALUMINA-ON-ALUMINA THA; WHAT WE LEARN FROM MORE THAN 10 YEAR EXPERIENCES



Abstract

Background: Ceramic-on-ceramic couplings are an attractive alternative bearing surfaces to eliminate or reduce problems related to polyethylene wear debris. Past disappointing experiences with alumina ceramic bearings have led to many improvements in the manufacture and the design of ceramic implants. The purpose of this study was to report the results of contemporary alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasties (THAs) with regard to wear, osteolysis, and fracture of the ceramic after a 10-year minimum follow-up.

Methods: We evaluated the results of a series of 66 primary alumina-on-alumina THAs with a metal-backed socket and a cementless stem in 59 patients. All of the patients were 64 years old or younger (mean, 42 years), and a single surgeon performed all of the procedures. They were evaluated clinically and radiographically at the 120 to 126 months follow-up (average, 123 months). During the follow-up, special regards were addressed to wear, periprosthetic osteolysis and ceramic failure.

Results: During the follow-up period, two patients (two hips) had died with the prosthesis in situ as the result of an unrelated medical condition. The mean Harris hip score was 94 points at the latest follow-up evaluation. All of the prostheses had radiographic evidence of a bone ingrowth. No implant was loosened radiographically and no implant was revised. Ceramic wear was not detectable in the 28 hips where differentiation of the femoral head from the cup was possible on radiographs. Periprosthetic osteolysis was observed in no hip. A fracture of the alumina femoral head and a peripheral chip fracture of the alumina insert occurred in one hip following a major motor vehicle accident. A periprosthetic femoral fracture, which required open reduction and internal fixation with metal cables, had occurred in one hip. This fracture healed without problem.

Conclusion: The results of contemporary alumina-on-alumina THAs with a metal-backed socket and a cementless stem were encouraging after a minimum follow up of 10 years. We believe that these improved alumina-on-alumina bearing implants offer a promising option for younger active patients.

Correspondence should be addressed to ISTA Secretariat, PO Box 6564, Auburn, CA 95604, USA. Tel: 1-916-454-9884, Fax: 1-916-454-9882, Email: ista@pacbell.net