header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

OC27: ANALYSIS OF EX VIVO RESURFACING HIP PROSTHESES AND COMPARISON WITH CLINICAL DATA



Abstract

Resurfacing metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty is currently showing promising clinical results. However there are concerns related to such implants, including the elevated levels of metal ions typically seen in patients. Valuable data can be obtained from explanted prostheses but due to their recent introduction few retrieval studies on resurfacing hip prostheses have been published.

Five ASR hip resurfacing prostheses were revised due to pain. From two patients, head and cup were available for independent explant analysis. In the other three cases only femoral components were available. All were removed from female patients and all were revised to ceramic-on-ceramic hip prostheses. Post-operative radiographic measurements of cup inclination and ante-version were obtained using the EBRA software. The surface roughness values of the articulating surfaces of the explants were measured using a non-contacting profilometer. A co-ordinate measuring machine was used to measure the diameter of the head and the cup and thus the diametral clearance. The same measurements were then taken from a new unused ASR prosthesis and compared. Using elastohydrodynamic theory the minimum effective film thickness of the implant was calculated. In turn this allowed the lubrication regime to be determined.

The average roughness values of the head and the cup of one implant were found to be 0.135microns and 0.058microns respectively, with a diametral clearance of 110microns. These results indicated that, at the time of removal, the prosthesis would have operated in the boundary lubrication regime. Other explants showed evidence of localised contact between the head and the rim of the acetabular cup, and these showed articulating surfaces with typical roughness values of between 0.025microns and 0.050microns. The new ASR had head and cup surface roughness values of 0.010microns and 0.012microns respectively and a diametral clearance of 87microns, implying that a new implant would operate under fluid film lubrication. All cups five were implanted with inclination angles over 45 degrees and anteversion over 25 degrees.

These results suggest that components with high inclination and anteversion angles display greater than expected wear and may operate in boundary rather than fluid film lubrication which may eventually lead to early failure.

Correspondence should be addressed to Dr Roger Bayston, Division of Orthopaedic and Accident Surgery, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, England.