header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

SCOLIOSIS CORRECTION WITH A SINGLE ROD FUSION TECHNIQUE IN DUCHENNE MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY



Abstract

Introduction: Duchenne’s Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) is a progresssive sex linked recessive disorder predominantly involving skeletal muscle. Scoliosis is almost universal in patients with DMD. Surgical stabilisation carries significant risks and complications with per-operative mortality of < 6%. Cardiopulmonary complications along with severe intraoperative blood loss requiring massive nlood transfusion are the major cause of morbidity.

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of single rod fusion technique in reducing the peroperative and post operative complications especially blood loss, duration of surgery and progression of curve.

Materials and Methods: Retrospective review- 32 patients with scoliosis secondary to DMD with an average age of 14 years (range, 11–18) underwent either single rod fusion technique (19 patients) using Isola rod system or Hartshill rectangle/double rod fusion technique (13 patients). Blood loss was measured directly from the peroperative suction and postoperative drainage, indirectly by weighing swabs. Vapour free hypotensive anaesthesia was used in all cases. Progression of curve was followed up in the outpatients.

Results: The mean operative time was 130 minutes (range, 80–180) for the single rod fusion technique in comparison to 250 minutes (range, 170–300) for the Hartshill/Double rod technique. The average blood loss for the single rod fusion technique was reduced, 2.2 L (range 0.4–4) versus 3.1L (0.8–4). The mean follow up was 35 months (range, 5–72). The inpatient stay was 12 days (range, 6–23). Seven patients developed complications: 3 ileus, 2 respiratory tract infections, one patient had loosening and migration of the rod, which required revision under LA, and one patient developed a superficial wound infection, which resolved with intravenous antibiotics.

Conclusion: In our experience, single rod stabilisation is a safe and quick method of correcting the DMD scoliotic spine, with less blood loss and complications compared to traditional methods.

Correspondence should be addressed to Mr Richard Wallace at Musgrave Park Hospital, 20 Stockman’s Lane, Belfast BT9 7JB, Northern Ireland.