header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

PRESENTING COMPLAINT AND THE PATH TO DIAGNOSIS IN SOFT TISSUE TUMOURS: INITIAL EXPERIENCE OF AN IRISH ORTHOPAEDIC TUMOUR SURGEON.



Abstract

Objective: Appendicular soft tissue tumours are rare. They represent less than 1% of all malignancy in Ireland. Consequently they are considered to difficult to diagnose and often require several opinions and investigations before a definitive diagnosis is arrived at. Mistakes in this process have been documented to result in the unnecessary loss of limb and life. The Bone and Soft Tissue Service in Cappagh National Orthopaedic Hospital treats a significant proportion of the tertiary referrals in this field. We looked at the referrals to the service of a newly appointed surgeon with an interest in this field.

Method: We prospectively reviewed the charts of all patients (26) with a soft tissue tumour referred to the senior author in his first year of practice and excluded all patients (1) who had an established and treatment instigated by an Orthopaedic Tumour specialist. Where information was not available in the chart the patients GP was contacted for further information.

Results: The most common presenting complaint was swelling (100%), only 3(12%) of the patients complained of pain. The mean time between observation of symptoms and seeking medical advice was 5.2 months (range 3–12 months). All the patients first sought attention from a GP. The mean number of doctors seen prior to presentation was 2 (range 1–4). 21 (84%) patients presented with MRI imaging.8 out of 20 (40%) secondary referrals had histological diagnosis on presentation however 3 of these were incidental findings from surgery performed without malignancy suspicion. Therefore only 5 out of 17 (29%) referrals for management of suspected malignancy had undergone biopsy at the referring institution. A mosaic of histological diagnoses was found, in proportion to previous epidemiological studies. 21 (84%) of the patients went on to have excisional surgery, one had amputation.

Conclusion: Although 40% of secondary referrals had undergone invasive procedures prior to presentation, only 29% had undergone intentional biopsy with a pre-operative suspicion for neoplasia. A pre biopsy referral rate of 71% compares favourably with published international rates. These tumours are rare and benign masses are 150 times more common however we must remain vigilant and consultation with a Tumour service should precede any invasive procedure whenever there is an element of doubt.

Correspondence should be addressed to Mr Richard Wallace at Musgrave Park Hospital, 20 Stockman’s Lane, Belfast BT9 7JB, Northern Ireland.