header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

MINIMALLY INVASIVE REDUCTION AND FIXATION OF INTRA-ARTICULAR DISTAL TIBIAL FRACTURES



Abstract

Introduction: The pilon fracture extending from the distal tibial metaphysis into the ankle joint represents one of the most challenging injuries faced by orthopaedic surgeons. Achieving the ideal of anatomic reduction and stable fixation is often impeded by the frequently severe soft tissue injuries associated with these fractures. In June 2004 we began treating intra-articular pilon fractures by minimally invasive techniques.

Materials and Methods: The minimally invasive technique used involved reduction of the fracture by ligamentotaxis and manipulation of the foot to correct rotation, varus/valgus, pro/recurvatum. Any further reduction was performed using an ankle arthroscope and a probe introduced through stab incisions. Following reduction a distal tibial locking plate was applied percutaneously to the medial of the tibia. All significant anterior or posterior distal tibial fragments were fixed separately with an anterior percutaneously inserted interfragmentary compression screw.

We compared all cases of closed intra-articluar fractures (AO types C2 and C3) fixed by the method described above in a one year period (June 2004 – June 2005) – Group 1 (n = 26), with the immediate previous one year period (June 2003 – June 2004) of matched closed fracture pattern fixed by formal open reduction and internal fixation – Group 2 (n = 16).

Mean follow up was 26 months. All bony and soft tissue complications were recorded. A specific assessment of outcome was undertaken using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS). Scoring was undertaken on two separate occasions at a mean of 9 and 24 months post operatively.

Results: We observed a far greater incidence of complications in the open reduction group when compared with the minimally invasive group. An excellent AOFAS result was obtained in 83% (20/24) of the patients in the minimally invasive group, the same result was achieved in only 12.5 % of the formal open reduction and fixation group.

Conclusion: The use of the minimally invasive reduction method described here in combination with the insertion of percutaneous fixation, represents a valuable method of treating the most complex of closed pilon fractures.

Correspondence should be addressed to Mr Richard Wallace at Musgrave Park Hospital, 20 Stockman’s Lane, Belfast BT9 7JB, Northern Ireland.