PAPER 045: GORE-TEX VS. TRADITIONAL CAST PADDING AFTER CLOSED REDUCTION OF DISPLACED DISTAL RADIUS FRACTURES IN CHILDREN: A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW

Abstract

Purpose: Waterproof casts have been shown to be a safe and effective means of immobilization in children with minimally displaced fractures. The purpose of this study was to determine if waterproof Gore-Tex-lined casts are as effective as traditional cotton-lined casts in the immediate postoperative period after closed reduction of displaced distal radius fractures in children.

Method: We performed a retrospective review of distal radius fractures that underwent closed reduction and application of a long-arm cast between June 2004 and December 2006. A total of 124 cases were included (55 Gore-Tex; 69 traditional cotton-lined). The primary outcome measure was redisplacement in the cast. The cast index was also used to assess the quality of cast molding. Data was analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. Power analyses were also conducted.

Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups with regards to translation of the radius or angulation of the radius on anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral radiographs at the time of injury, postreduction, or cast removal. Redisplacement as measured by the change in translation of the radius and angulation of the radius on AP and lateral radiographs from the time of reduction to cast removal was also not significantly different between the two groups. The mean cast index for the Gore-Tex and traditional cotton-lined groups was 0.882 and 0.873 respectively, which was not a significant difference.

Conclusion: A waterproof Gore-Tex-lined cast will maintain fracture reduction as well as a cotton-lined cast for closed reductions of distal radius fractures in children in the immediate postreduction period. Waterproof casts also provide extensive benefits to the patient with regards to bathing, hygiene, and participation in aquatic activities