header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

EXTENDED SCOPE PHYSIOTHERAPISTS: HOW OFTEN DOES THEIR CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS AGREE WITH THE MRI SCAN?



Abstract

Objective: To determine whether extended scope physiotherapists (ESP’s) in spinal clinics are able to accurately assess and diagnose patient pathology as verified by MRI findings.

Methods: This is a prospective study of 318 new spinal outpatients assessed and examined by one of two spinal ESP’s. 76 patients (24%) were referred for an MRI scan. At the time of request for MRI scan the likelihood of specific spinal pathology correlating with the MRI scan was noted on a four point scale dividing the patients into 4 groups:

  • Group 4 = Very high suspicion of pathology (n=41)

  • Group 3 = Moderate suspicion of pathology (n=21)

  • Group 2 = Some suspicion of pathology (n=10)

  • Group 1 = Pathology unlikely but scan indicated eg thoracic pain (n=4).

Results: Of the 76 patients referred for an MRI scan, 54 (71%) had an MRI scan result that would correlate with the clinical picture. Looking at the percentage of scans correlating with the clinical picture for each of the 4 groups:

  • Group 4: 88%

  • Group 3: 67%

  • Group 2: 40%

  • Group 1: 0%

Conclusion: Dividing the patients into groups by clinical suspicion is essential for evaluating a clinician’s ability in spinal assessment. Further evaluation of Consultants, Fellows and Specialist Registrars is on going. This type of study could form a basis for competency measures for staff development and training if they are undertaking extended roles.

Correspondence should be addressed to Sue Woordward, Britspine Secretariat, 9 Linsdale Gardens, Gedling, Nottingham NG4 4GY, England. Email: sue.britspine@hotmail.com