Abstract
Previous studies have shown improved outcome following surgery for spinal cord compression due to metastatic disease. Further papers have shown that many patients with metastatic disease are not referred for orthopaedic opinion. The aims of this paper are to study the survival and morbidity of patients with spinal metastatic disease who receive radiotherapy.
Do patients develop instability and progressive neurological compromise?
Do patients require surgery or are the majority adequately treated by oncologists?
Review of patients receiving radiotherapy for pain relief or cord compression as a result of metastatic disease. Patients were scored with regards to Tomita and Tokuhashi, survival and for deterioration in neurology or spinal instability.
94 patients reviewed. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 1 year or until deceased.
Majority of patients had a primary diagnosis of lung, prostate or breast carcinoma.
Mean Tomita score of 6, Tokuhashi score 7, and mean survival following radiotherapy of 8 months.
11:94 patients referred for surgical opinion.
Four patients developed progressive neurology on follow-up.
One patient developed spinal instability. The remainder of the patients did not deteriorate in neurology and did not develop spinal instability.
All patients with normal neurology at time of radiotherapy did not develop spinal cord compression or cauda equina at a later date.
This study suggests that the vast majority of patients with spinal metastatic disease do not progress to spinal instability or cord compression, and that prophylactic surgery would not be of benefit.
The referral rate to spinal surgeons remains low as few patients under the care of the oncologists develop spinal complications.
Correspondence should be addressed to Sue Woordward, Britspine Secretariat, 9 Linsdale Gardens, Gedling, Nottingham NG4 4GY, England. Email: sue.britspine@hotmail.com
