header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY AND FEMORAL NECK FRACTURE: AN ANATOMICAL STUDY



Abstract

Femoral neck fracture is a serious complication in hip resurfacing arthroplasty and reducing its risk is a major challenge. From a biomechanical point of view changing the geometrical characteristics in surgery could affect the stresses in the femoral neck. We analysed standing AP X-rays of 85 randomly selected patients having pain in the pelvic region in order to gain better understanding of the geometrical influences. Patients were selected on age, weight, pelvis visibility and no deformations of the proximal femur. A variety of geometrical characteristics has been measured and analysed using the two-sided t-test.

A significant difference was found between men and women, which was compared to previous publications in order to verify the measurement method. Statistical indication could not be found for leg-dominancy influencing geometrical dimensions. This is not mentioned in literature, but it is mentioned that the BMC and BMD differs between the legs. Several linear relations have been found between geometrical characteristics and demographics. The average head-neck ratio for both left and right was about 1.4 and the ratio of the abductor moment arm and body moment arm was about 2.1. The linear relation between femoral head diameter and femoral neck diameter indicates that the femoral component should be chosen according to the natural head diameter. The ratio between the abductor arm and body arm in combination with the bodyweight determines the static stresses in the femoral neck and can be changed in surgery by altering the hip axis length and neck shaft angle.

Conclusion: The geometrical characteristics can be changed in surgery and can reduce the stresses in the neck, but in hip resurfacing these changes are relatively small. The question is how much can the geometry be changed and could these changes lead to complications.

Correspondence should be addressed to EORS Secretariat Mag. Gerlinde M. Jahn, c/o Vienna Medical Academy, Alserstrasse 4, 1090 Vienna, Austria. Fax: +43-1-4078274. Email: eors@medacad.org