header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

CLINICAL EXPERIENCE WITH THE LESS INVASIVE STABILISATION SYSTEM (LISS)



Abstract

We report the experience of a Grade 1 Trauma Centre in treating distal femoral and tibial fractures with the Less Invasive Stabilisation System (LISS). Medium term outcomes are presented with a discussion of clinical indications.

We conducted retrospective study of patients presenting to St James University Hospital with distal femoral and proximal tibial fractures. Case notes were reviewed for demographics, mode and severity of injury, clinical time to union and complications. AO fracture classification and radiological time to union were assessed.

24 patients (10 males, 14 females) underwent LISS fixation. Average age was 69.7 years (range 31–95 years). Mean injury severity score was 14 (Range 9–36). Overall, there were five patients with isolated proximal tibial fractures, seventeen with isolated femoral fractures and two with fractures of both the distal femur and proximal tibia. Two of the distal femoral fractures were open (Gustillo type IIb). According to the AO classification, the distal femoral fractures were sub-divided into 4 Type 33A fractures, 5 Type 33B fractures, 6 Type 33C fractures, 2 Type 32B fractures and 2 Type 32C fractures. The proximal tibial fractures comprised 3 Type 41-A2, 2 Type 41-C1 and 2 Type 41-C2 fractures.

HSS scores for the 24 acute cases were 8 excellent, 8 good, 6 fair and 2 poor results. Average HSS score was 78.8 points. Time to union was determined clinically and radiologically. Bony union was achieved in 23 cases (95.8%). Mean time to radiological union was 3.9 months (range 2–5 months), and clinical union at a mean of 4.46 months (range 3–6 months).

We illustrate that the LISS is a useful technique for treating distal femoral and proximal tibial fractures which are often a complex management problem in the elderly population. With increasing incidence of fragility fractures we suggest that this may be an underused treatment option.

Correspondence should be addressed to Mr T Wilton, c/o BOA, BASK at the Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE, England.