RESULTS AND LESSONS FROM 11 YEARS EXPERIENCE WITH THE AVON PATELLOFEMORAL ARTHROPLASTY

Abstract

Introduction: The Bristol Knee group has performed over 600 patellofemoral arthroplasties in the last 18 years. Experience with the Lubinus prosthesis led to the development of the Avon Prosthesis. In the last 11 years we have prospectively recorded the results of over 470 consecutive Avon arthroplasties. The main cause of the 9.5% failure is arthritic disease progression in the tibiofemoral compartments.

Patients and Method: Over the last 11 years we have identified 21 patients from our own series and from tertiary referrals that have persistent pain, which was mainly due to technical error rather than arthritic disease progression. The causes can be classified into three main reasons: First, an incorrect anterior cut in the saggital plane which was cut in either too much flexion or extension. Second, the anterior cut had inadequate external rotation, which should be 3–6 degrees to lateralise the groove and facilitate correct tracking. Third, the prosthesis was oversized in several cases leading to retinacular impingement.

Results: The overall results followed up to 10 years showed excellent and consistent improvement in both pain and function as judged by the WOMAC 12 scale. Of those patients with persistent pain, seven had the femoral component revised to either resize the prosthesis or revise the alignment of the anterior resection and correctly inset the prosthesis, with good results. Ten cases were revised to a total knee replacement. In the remaining cases, two had an Insall realignment, one a patella distalisation, and in one no treatment was required. As a permanent solution new instruments were designed to reduce the incision size and increase the accuracy of the saggial alignment and to create an exact amount of external rotation.

Conclusion: The lessons from 11 years experience with the Avon arthroplasty has led to the development of improved instrumentation which should reduce the failures.