header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

THE EFFECT OF TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT ON THE EXTENSOR RETINACULUM



Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that insertion of a total knee replacement (TKR) may effect range of motion as a consequence of excessive stretching of the retinaculae.

Methods: 8 fresh frozen cadaver knees were placed on a customised testing rig. The femur was rigidly fixed allowing the tibia to move freely through an arc of flexion. The quadriceps were loaded to 175N in their physiologic lines of action using a cable, pulley and weight system. The iliotibial tract was loaded with 30N. Tibiofemoral flexion and extension was measured using an optical tracking system. Monofilament sutures were passed along the fibres of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) and the deep transverse band in the lateral retinaculum with the anterior ends attached to the patella. The posterior suture ends were attached to ‘Linear Variable Displacement Transducers’. Thus small changes in ligament length were recorded by the transducers. Ligament length changes were recorded every 10° from 90° to 0° during an extension cycle. A transpatellar approach was used when performing the TKR to preserve the medial and lateral retinaculae. Testing was conducted on an intact knee and following insertion of a cruciate retaining TKR (Genesis II). Statistical analysis was performed using a two way ANOVA test.

Results: The MPFL had a mean behaviour close to isometric, while the lateral retinaculum slackened by a mean of 6mm as the knee extended from 60 degrees (Fig 1). After knee replacement there was no statistically significant difference seen in ligament length change patterns in the MPFL, however the lateral retinaculum showed significant slackening from 10 to 0°.

Conclusion: The data does not support the hypothesis that insertion of a TKR causes abnormal stretching of the retinaculuae. This result relates specifically to the TKR design tested.

Correspondence should be addressed to Mr T Wilton, c/o BOA, BASK at the Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE, England.