header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

THE RELIABILITY AND ACCURACY OF DIGITAL TEMPLATING IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY



Abstract

We aimed to determine the reliability, accuracy and consequently the clinical role of digital templating in the pre-operative work up for total knee arthroplasty patients.

With the increasing use of digital radiology images, analogue templating may soon be defunct. Digital templating is a more recent development and its role is yet to be determined.

Ten pre-operative digital radiographs were templated by four independent observers. Inter-observer and intra-observer reliability was assessed using the kappa measure of concordance. Subsequently, 40 consecutive total knee arthroplasty patients underwent pre-operative digital templating. This was a blinded process by a consultant surgeon not involved with the operation. Each patient underwent TKR using the PFC Sigma System sized intra-operatively, without the operating surgeon having knowledge of the pre-operative templating result. Comparison was made between the pre-operative digital templates and the blinded intra-operative sizing.

For both the femoral and tibial templating there was good to very good inter- and intra-observer agreement. For the femoral component the templating was correct in 47.5% (± 1 size difference 97.5%). The tibial templating was correct in 55% (± 1 size difference 100%).

The inter- and intra-observer reliability of digital templating process has been shown to be acceptable but the correlation between digital templating and the actual size implanted is poor. Our series shows a similar accuracy to the published data on analogue templating for the same implant. Like analogue templating, its clinical role remains uncertain and its poor correlation to the actual implant sizes limits its usefulness.

Correspondence should be addressed to Mr T Wilton, c/o BOA, BASK at the Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE, England.