header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

REVISION OF FAILED HIP RESURFACING DUE TO METAL HYPERSENSITIVITY (ALVAL).



Abstract

Introduction: Hip Resurfacing has increased in popularity, particularly in young, active patients. However, concerns remain regarding metal ion levels, hypersensitivity leading to aseptic lymphocytic-vasculitis-associated lesions(ALVAL) and AVN. The purpose of this study was to document our experience of revising resurfacing arthroplasty for ALVAL.

Methods: All patients undergoing conversion of hip resurfacing to total hip replacement at our institution were reviewed. The notes were reviewed for the reason for revision, the make of the implant, time interval between primary procedure and revision and final diagnosis. Radiographs were reviewed to assess for implant alignment, signs of loosening, neck thinning and AVN.

Results: Out of the 34 patients who had revision surgery 13 were revised for suspected ALVAL, with mean age of 58.8 years at a mean 42.9 months following primary surgery. Of the 13 resurfacings revisions 11 were Birmingham resurfacing and 1 each of Cormet and ASR resurfacing. Groin pain was the presenting complaint in all patients, 5 patients developed their symptoms immediately postoperatively whilst 8 developed symptoms at mean 28.25 months. Haematological investigations were non-diagnostic. Radiographs were normal in 4 patients, whilst 4 demonstrated a loose cup. Thinning of femoral neck and vertical cup alignment were present in 2 patients each while 1 patient had both vertical cup and thinning of femoral neck. All revisions were achieved with primary implants and all patients had immediate pain relief after surgery. Implants and tissue were sent for laboratory analysis. 3 patients had a confirmed histological diagnosis of ALVAL, the remaining cases had identical operative findings and are presumed ALVAL.

Discussion: ALVAL accounts for nearly 1/3 of all our revisions for failed resurfacing arthroplasty. Unexplained pain in patients with resurfacing arthroplasty should be considered for a diagnosis of ALVAL and investigated appropriately. Symptoms tend to resolve reliably following conversion to total hip arthroplasty.

Correspondence should be addressed to Mr Peter Howard, Editorial Secretary, BHS, c/o BOA, The Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE, England.