header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

STRAIN IN DISTAL TIBIAL OSTEOTOMY STABILISED WITH METAPHYSEAL AND DISTAL TIBIAL LOCKING COMPRESSION PLATES



Abstract

Background: Locking plates are used frequently in distal tibial fractures. We tested two different types of locking compression plates (LCP): the metaphyseal plate (MP) and the distal tibial plate (DTP). We evaluated the strain imposed on an experimental tibial osteotomy, and the stability of plate-tibia (composite bone) construct using LCP-MP and LCP-DTP.

Materials and methods: Twin strain gauged special composite tibial bones were used to simulate the human tibiae. We tested 5 tibiae: one was used as control, two tibiae were tested using LCP-MP, and two with LCP-DTP. Strain was measured by subjecting each construct to a cyclic load of 700 N at 3 Hz in neutral, flexion, extension and torsion to simulate the normal walking cycle.

Results: When compared with the control tibia, strain during the neutral moment at the proximal and distal strain gauge site in the LCP-MP and LCP-DTP constructs decreased by 6.4%/−41.5% and −39%/−47%, respectively. In flexion, the strain increased consistently in both the proximal and distal strain gauge sites using the LCP-MP by 34% and 109%. Using the LCP-DTP, the strain at the proximal strain gauge site decreased by 0.2% and increased by 18% at the distal strain gauge site. In extension, strain decreased by 25% at the proximal strain gauge site, and by 60% at the distal strain gauge site in the LCP –MP construct. In the LCP-DTP construct, the strain decreased by 13% at the proximal strain gauge site, and by 21% at the distal strain gauge site. There were no statistically significant torsional differences between LCP-MP and LCP-DTP group (P=0.121). In this experimental setup, the LCP-DTPs offer greater control of strain than LCP-MPs. They also confer greater resistance to fracture macro-movements, and improved stiffness consistently in neutral, flexion, and torsion than LCP-MPs.

Conclusion: The strain from osteotomised tibiae stabilised with LCP-MPs and LCP-DTPs were close to the strain of the control tibia. Both these locking plates were equally good and conferred greater stiffness in all loading positions.

Correspondence should be addressed to: D. Singh, BOFAS, c/o BOA, The Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE.