header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

PREDICTION OF SPATIAL ORIENTATION AND MORPHOLOGY OF CALCANEONAVICULAR COALITIONS



Abstract

Background: Calcaneonavicular coalitions (CNC) have been reported to be associated with anatomical aberrations of either the calcaneus and/or navicular bones. These morphological abnormalities may complicate accurate surgical resection. Three-dimensional analysis of spatial orientation and morphological characteristics may help in preoperative planning of resection.

Materials and Methods: Sixteen feet diagnosed with CNC were evaluated by means of 3D CT modeling. Three angles were defined that were expressed in relation to one reproducible landmark (lateral border of the calcaneus): the dorsoplantar inclination, anteroposterior inclination and socket angle. The contact surface area was determined from the depth and width of the coalitions. Three-dimensional reconstructions of the calcanei evaluated the presence and morphology of the anterior calcaneal facet and of a navicular beak. The inter-observer correlations were assessed for the accuracy of the measurement methods. Sixteen normal feet were used as controls for comparison of the socket angle and anatomy of the anterior calcaneal facet and of the navicular beak.

Results: The dorsoplantar inclination angle averaged 50° (±17), the anteroposterior inclination angle 64° (±15), and the pathologic socket angle 98° (±11). The average contact area was 156mm2. Ninety-four percent of all patients in the CNC group revealed a plantar navicular beak. In 50% of those patients the anterior calcaneal facet was replaced by the navicular portion and in 44% the facet was totally missing. In contrast, the socket angle in the control group averaged 77° (± 18), which was found to be statistically different than the CNC group (p=0.0004). Only 25% of the patients in the control group had a plantar navicular beak. Statistically significant inter-observer correlations were found for all measured angles.

Conclusions: Computer aided CT analysis and reconstructions help to determine the spatial orientations of CNC and provide useful information in order to anticipate morphological abnormalities of the calcaneus and navicular.

Correspondence should be addressed to: D. Singh, BOFAS, c/o BOA, The Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE.