header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

LONGITUDINAL MONITORING OF PERIACETABULAR OSTEOLYSIS USING COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY AND THE SENSITIVITY OF PLAIN RADIOGRAPHS



Abstract

Periprosthetic osteolysis is a serious medium to long-term complication of total hip arthroplasty. Interobserver reliability of detecting osteolysis around cementless ace-tabular components is reported to be poor using plain radiographs. Quantitative computed tomography (CT) provides sensitive and accurate measures of osteolytic lesion volume, however, there may remain a role for plain radiographs in monitoring progression of osteolysis. The aim of this study was to use quantitative CT to monitor the progression of osteolytic lesions around cementless acetabular components and to compare plain radiographs and CT in determining the progression of osteolysis.

A high-resolution multi-slice quantitative CT scanner with metal artefact suppression was used to determine the volume of osteolysis around 18 cementless acetabular components. The mean time since arthroplasty was 14 years (range 10–15 years) at the initial CT. Repeat scans of the hip were undertaken over a five-year period to determine progression of osteolysis with time. A second blinded observer examined anteroposterior and lateral plain radiographs taken at the same time as the CT scans and measured the location and area of osteolytic lesions.

CT measurements determined that in ten of 18 hips (56%), osteolytic lesions progressed by more than 1cm3/yr. Progression in size of osteolytic lesions was significantly associated with hips with larger osteolytic lesions at the initial CT (p=0.0005). The mean volume of osteolysis progression was 4.9cm3/year (range 2.8–7.5cm3/yr) for cases with osteolysis volumes greater than 10cm3 at the initial CT, and 0.7cm3/yr (range 0–2.3cm3/yr) for cases with osteolysis volumes smaller than or equal to 10cm3 at the initial CT (p=0.002). Importantly, the rate of osteolysis progression between CT scans varied greatly in some hips. In contrast, using plain radiograph assessment, progression in the area of osteolytic lesions was only detected in 10% of hips.

In conclusion, quantitative CT provides new insights into the natural history of periacetabular osteolysis. Total osteolysis volume greater than 10cm3 is associated with a high risk of progression and progress, on average, at a greater rate than those less than 10cm3. Plain radiographs, including a lateral view, are an unreliable clinical diagnostic tool to predict substantial progression of periacetabular osteolytic lesions.

Correspondence should be addressed to David Haynes, PhD, Senior Lecturer, President ANZORS, at Discipline of Pathology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia