Abstract
The goal of this study was to determine which of two techniques for the treatment of peri-prosthetic femoral shaft fractures has the greatest torsional integrity. The study designed was a laboratory study, using 13 matched pairs of embalmed femurs. The femurs were implanted with a cemented total hip prosthesis, with a transverse osteotomy distal to the stem. These fractures were fixed either with a metal plate with three proximal unicortical screws and three distal bicortical screws or with three proximal cables and three distal bicortical screws. The fracture fixation was tested to failure in torsion. The pattern of failure and torsional limits were recorded.
There was no significant difference to failure level between the two constructs. Failure with the proximal unicortical screws was usually catastrophic versus non-catastrophic with proximal cables. The femurs were significantly more likely to fracture in internal rotation.
Treatment with proximal cables has the same load to failure in torsion but significantly less complications than with unicortical screws, in agreement with the literature. The findings of the construct being weaker in internal rotation, appears to be a new finding and an area of possible new research.
Correspondence should be addressed to Associate Professor N. Susan Stott at Orthopaedic Department, Starship Children’s Hospital, Private Bag 92024, Auckland, New Zealand
