header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF NON-RIGID FIXATION IN DEGENERATIVE INTERVERTEBRAL LUMBAR SEGMENTS: WALLIS SYSTEM



Abstract

Background: Non-rigid fixation clearly appears to be a useful technique in the management of degenerative intervertebral lumbar disc disease. A mobile, dynamic stabilization restricting segmental motion is possible to be advantageous in various indications, allowing greater physiological function and reducing the inherent disadvantages of rigid instrumentation and fusion.

Aim: This study is a prospective analysis of the early results of second generation Wallis implant for degenerative disc disease.

Methods and Materials: Twenty-five patients with leg and back pain that was not responsive to conservative treatment underwent discectomy and implantation of second generation device. There were 22 one-level and 3 two-level cases. The preoperative radiological work-up included conventional X-rays, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). All patients underwent neurological examination, assessment of pain on a visual analog scale, and a functional evaluation using the Revised Oswestry disability index before surgery, 3 months after surgery and at follow- up.

Results: A total of 25 patients (13 men, 12 women) with a mean age of 51.9 years (range, 34 to 69 years) were evaluated with a mean follow-up of 1.4 year after the intervention. Mean pain and function scores improved significantly from baseline to follow up as follows: – back pain scale from 7.2 to 2.9, leg pain scale from 6.8 to 2.5 and Oswestry Disability Index from 59.1% to 22.6%. No cases of infection or worsening of neurological deficit occurred. One patient had revision surgery for persistent pain as a result of granulation tissue underneath the implant. No mechanical failure of the implants or loosening was observed and the process retained motion.

Conclusion: Clinical results are satisfactory and compare well with those obtained by conventional procedures in addition to which mobile stabilisation are less invasive then fusion. Wallis neutralisation proves to be a safe and effective in the treatment of unstable lumbar condition.

Correspondence should be addressed to Mr J. O’Dowd, Honorary Secretary at SBPR c/o BOA, Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3PE.