header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

MANAGEMENT OF FOOT OSTEOMYELITIS. A REVIEW OF 30 CASES.



Abstract

Introduction: Management strategies and results in 30 cases of foot osteomyelitis are presented.

Patients-Methods: From 1/2003 – 1/2006, 30 patients (15 men, 15 women, mean age 47.7 years, range 1.5–82) presenting with foot osteomyelitis were treated. Mean hospital stay was 12.6 days (range 1–45) and 1.3 hospital admissions were recorded (range 1–4). The follow-up period averaged 15.7 months (range 3–56). Bone infection involved the toes in 3 cases, the metatarsals in 9, the head of the hallux in 2, the midfoot in 3, the calcaneus in 9, whereas 3 cases presented as generalized charcot’s osteomyelitis. Eleven patients were classified as host-type A, 10 as B and 9 as C. Nine patients were diabetic, one rheumatoid, four had vascular insufficiency, two had insensate feet. An open calacaneal fracture was the cause in two cases, whereas ORIF of a closed calacaneal fracture in one, ORIF of metatarsal fractures in one and hallux valgus corrective surgery in two. One paediatric patient with calcaneal osteomyelitis developed subtalar arthritis. A draining sinus/wound was present in 24 cases. Each patient underwent an average of 2.3 surgical procedures (range 1–7). The treatment protocol included surgical debridement, use of the bead-pouch technique for local antibiotic administration and closure primarily (n=23), or by secondary healing (n=3), skin graft (n=2), local fasciocutaneous (n=1), or free vascularized muscle flap (n=1). Systemic antibiotics according to cultures were administered for 5–7 days. Amputation was undertaken if salvaging or reconstructive procedures could not be undertaken.

Results: Infection control (salvageable cases) was achieved in 23 cases (76.7%), whereas amputations were performed in 7 cases (23.3%). Four amputees were classified as host C (57.1%), whereas a significantly lower rate of patients successfully treated (21.7%) were host-C (p=0.0008). A below knee amputation was undertaken in two host-type C patients with generalized osteomyelitis of the foot. One 1st ray and two 1st and 2nd ray amputations were performed for not salvageable diabetic feet infections. Finally in 3 cases of posttraumatic chronic toe osteomyelitis in host-type A patients, a distal phalanx amputation was the definite solution. One patient developed a septic TKR in the contralateral leg and one diabetic patient developed osteomyelitis at a different location in the earlier affected foot.

Conclusions: The treatment strategy of radical debridement, local antibiotic delivery by the bead-pouch technique and use of flaps if needed, successfully treated salvageable feet. Amputation was the solution in neglected cases and in immunocompromised patients.

Correspondence should be addressed to Ms Larissa Welti, Scientific Secretary, EFORT Central Office, Technoparkstrasse 1, CH-8005 Zürich, Switzerland