header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

TEN-YEAR RESULTS OF A COMPOSITE TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT STEM IN YOUNG PATIENTS



Abstract

Background : A composite femoral stem was introduced with a structural stiffness similar to that of the native femur to promote proximal load transfer. This consisted of a cobalt-chromium alloy core surrounded by an injection-moulded layer of polyaryletherketone covered with a porous titanium mesh.

Material and Methods: 31 consecutive primary total hip replacement stems were implanted in 26 patients with an average age of 37 years (range 17–57) using the Epoch stem (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) as part of a prospective multi-centre trial. A cementless Harris-Galante I acetabular component with a 28mm polyethylene insert (Zimmer) was used in 29 cases, a Plasmacup with 28mm polyethylene insert (Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany) in 1 case and a bipolar head in 1 case. Annual follow-up with Harris Hip Scores and radiographic evaluation was performed for a mean of 10.1 years.

Results : Harris Hip Scores improved from a mean of 52 points preoperatively to 90 at the time of last follow-up. Radiographs showed no stem migration or loosening. 4 cases with polyethylene wear showed trochanteric osteolysis. Specific radiographic features noted were a sclerotic halo in Gruen zones 1 in 8 cases, calcar rounding in 10 cases and improvement in calcar appearance with squaring of the calcar in 4 cases. Calcar resorption was seen in 1 case associated with polyethylene wear. There have been 8 instances of revision of the head or acetabular component- 3 liner exchanges for polyethylene wear, 3 acetabular component revisions for liner dissociation with associated cup damage, 1 acetabular component revision for infection and 1 bipolar head revised to unipolar head with cementless acetabular component for pain. No stem has required or requires revision.

Conclusion : The Epoch stem resulted in an excellent clinical outcome with evidence of radiographic stability and proximal bone preservation, and no cases of stem revision in a cohort of young patients with long-term follow-up.

Correspondence should be addressed to Ms Larissa Welti, Scientific Secretary, EFORT Central Office, Technoparkstrasse 1, CH-8005 Zürich, Switzerland