header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

ALTERED DISC PROPERTIES AFTER AN OSTEOPOROTIC VERTEBRAL FRACTURE. IS IT A RISK FACTOR FOR ADJACENT FRACTURES?



Abstract

Residual kyphotic deformity is considered the main factor for the increased risk of new fractures after an osteoporotic vertebral fracture. We hypothesized that even in the absence of kyphotic deformity, the altered pressure profile of the disc after a fracture will increase the risk for subsequent fractures.

Materials and Methods: Six fresh-frozen, human thoracolumbar specimens, consisting of 5 adjacent vertebrae, were used. A void was randomly created under the upper (n=3) or the lower (n=3) endplate of the middle vertebra. The specimen was then compressed in flexion until a selective fracture of the weakened endplate was observed. Vertebral kyphosis was reduced with extension. After cementation of the fracture, the rest of the trabecular content was evacuated and was filled with cement. Specimens were tested in flexion-extension (±6Nm) under 400N preload before and after the index fracture. Pressure was recorded at the discs above and below the fractured VB and strain at the anterior wall of the adjacent VBs. Finally, the specimen was loaded in flexion until a subsequent fracture was observed on fluoroscopy.

Results: In the intact specimens, nucleus pressure increased by 26.4±13.9% in full flexion compared to neutral posture. After the index fracture, the pressure in full flexion increased by 15.2±11 % in the discs with unfractured endplates, but decreased by 19±26.7% in the discs with the fractured endplate (p< 0.05). Anterior wall strain at the VB adjacent to the fractured endplate increased by 94.2%±22.8% (p=0.02), compared to an 18.2%±7.1% (p=0.98) increase at the VB adjacent to the unfractured endplate. Subsequent loading of the specimens after cementation of the index fracture resulted in a fracture of the adjacent VB close to the fractured endplate of the middle vertebra in 4 specimens and at the upper potted VB in one specimen. Maximum load applied with the actuators failed to create a fracture in one specimen.

Discussion: The effects of the fractured endplate were isolated by eliminating other known parameters. Vertebral kyphosis was reduced and cement was similarly distributed under both endplates.

In the intact specimens, nucleus pressure gradually increased during flexion. This can more evenly distribute the load during flexion to the entire surface of the endplate and avoid excessive load concentration to the anterior portion. After an endplate fracture, the nucleus pressure gradually decreased during flexion, meaning that the anterior annulus was forced to bear more load. This uneven load transfer to the anterior part of the VB resulted in doubling the strain at the VB adjacent to the fractured end plate. All adjacent factures were observed at the vertebra next to the damaged endplate. The altered mechanical behavior of the nucleus can be ascribed to the increased available space after the endplate depression.

Correspondence should be addressed to Ms Larissa Welti, Scientific Secretary, EFORT Central Office, Technoparkstrasse 1, CH-8005 Zürich, Switzerland