header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

TRANSORAL KYPHOPLASTY FOR TUMORS IN C2



Abstract

Object. Our purpose is to describe a new surgical technique, the transoral kyphoplasty, that we performed in 3 cases of tumors in C2.

Materials and Methods. From February 2004 to January 2006 3 cases of C2 tumoral localizations did not show healing after 6 months of conservative treatments. To reduce pain and avoid both C2 collapse and prolonged immobilization transoral kyphoplasties were performed.

Results. There were no complications and/or complaints related to the procedure. There were no C2 related symptoms or neurological problems. The first patient died 8 months after surgery due to unrelated causes. The second and the third are alive and, follow ups of 2 years and 8 months respectively, reveal good and pain-free cervical motion, with no findings regarding pathologic mobility/instability on X-ray and CT.

Discussion. The management of tumors of the C2 body is still controversial. In cancer patients non-operative treatment could fail. In these cases the literature recommends internal fixation (anterior or posterior), percutaneous vertebroplasty, or transoral vertebroplasty [14]. Anatomically, the transoral route is the most straightforward percutaneous access to the C2 body [4]. In our cases, after conservative treatment failure, we performed the transoral kyphoplasty to avoid major surgical procedures, and considering kyphoplasty an improvement of the vertebroplasty. While maintaining the normal cervical spine anatomy, and avoiding arthrodesis or fixation that reduce the cervical spine range of motion, in the thoracolumbar spine kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty is correlated with a reduction in the complication rate [5].

Conclusions. Transoral kyphoplasty could be considered a safe, quick and effective treatment in reducing pain and avoiding vertebral collapse in patients with tumors in C2, not responding to non-operative treatment.

Correspondence should be addressed to Ms Larissa Welti, Scientific Secretary, EFORT Central Office, Technoparkstrasse 1, CH-8005 Zürich, Switzerland

References

1 Galibert P, Deramond H, Rosat P, et al. Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty. Neurochirurgie1987;33:166–8. Google Scholar

2 Tong FC, Cloft HJ, Joseph GJ, et al. Transoral approach to cervical vertebroplasty for multiple myeloma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:1322–1324. Google Scholar

3 Gailloud P, Martin JB, Olivi A, Rufenacht DA, Murphy KJ. Transoral vertebroplasty for a fractured C2 aneurysmal bone cyst. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2002;13:340–341. Google Scholar

4 Martin JB, Gailloud P, Dietrich PY, Luciani ME, Somon T, Sappino PA, Rufenach DA. Direct transoral approach to C2 for percutaneous vertebroplasty. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2002;25:517–519. Google Scholar

5 Togawa D, Kovacic JJ, Bauer TW, Reinhardt MK, Brodke DS, Lieberman IH. Radiographic and histologic findings of vertebral augmentation using polymethylmethacrylate in the primate spine: percutaneous vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty. Spine2006;31:E4–10. Google Scholar