ACCURACY OF THE ANTERIOR PELVIC PLANE TO GUIDE CUP INSERTION BY USING IMAGELESS COMPUTER ASSISTANCE: VARIATION OF POSITION IN 106 SUBJECTS

Abstract

Introduction: The anterior pelvic plane (APP), described by Lewinnek, is defined by the following points : anterior iliac spines, pubic symphysis. This plan is mostly considered as vertical in weight bearing and is currently used as the reference to guide cup insertion by means of imageless computer assistance (CAS). However, to our knowledge, there is no data that strongly confirm APP is vertical in weight bearing and how much his orientation is modified with regards operative position, or THA insertion. This study assessed these data by means of a radiological analysis.

Material and Methods: The orientation of the APP was measured with regards to the vertical plane on weight-bearing profile X-rays of the pelvis in 106 subjects including:

1. 1) 82 patients with THA (40 who had at least one dislocation, and 42 matched patients without instability randomly selected, 19 of these 42 underwent a profile X-ray of the pelvis before and after THA insertion)

2. 2) and 24 standard subjects who underwent lying and weight-bearing profile X-rays of the pelvis to assess the modifications of orientation of the pelvis between these two positions.

Results: Thirty-eight percent of the subjects in weight-bearing had an orientation of the APP different of more than ± 5° from vertical plane and 13% were out of the interval ±10°. The orientation of the APP was not significantly different between the groups (standard and THA) nor between the groups who had stable or unstable THA. The orientation of the APP was significantly modified between lying and weight-bearing posture, from a mean of 1,2° lying to −2,25° upright. Under these conditions, 12 subjects presented a variation of more than 7°. Insertion of a THA did not significantly modify the orientation of the APP in weight-bearing among the 19 subjects (variations were small (−1° ± 7° [from – 21° to 8°]), but were more than 5° for 7 of the 19 subjects).

Discussion and Conclusion: Most of the surgeons use the APP as a reference to guide navigation for cup insertion, considering it is vertical in weight-bearing. However, it is not true for 38% with a margin of 10°, which is equivalent to approximately half of the anatomical anteversion of the acetabulum. Standing up produced a significant variation of the orientation of the APP with regards to lying position. These errors that are not integrated by most of the CAS without preoperative CT scans, may produce cam effect or dislocation when the patient is moving to sited position. The variations of APP orientation with regards to vertical plane suggest it is not adequate to guide the CAS insertion of the cup. There is no reliable reference, easily identifiable during surgery that integrates the variations of position of the pelvis. This leads us to promote a new CAS for THA insertion free of reference plane, based on kinematics.