header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

AUTOLOGOUS ILIAC CREST BONE GRAFT VERSUS DEMINERALIZED BONE MATRIX ALLOGRAFT FOR INTERCARPAL FUSIONS.



Abstract

Despite the widespread use of demineralized bone matrix (DBM) allografts there are few clinical studies comparing DBM to iliac crest bone grafting (ICBG). A comparison of DBM to ICBG is presented in patients who underwent four corner fusions of the wrist by one surgeon using identical operating technique.

The senior author’s first fourteen consecutive patients in which DBM was used for four corner fusion were compared with fourteen patients selected from a total of 48 patients in which ICBG was used. The ICBG group was matched for age, indication and healing impairing co-morbidities (mainly smoking). Patient radiographs from the 8th, 12th and 24th postoperative week follow up were digitized and blinded. Three orthopaedic surgeons, not involved in the patients care, rated the degree of bony union in a scale of 0 (no evidence of healing) to 3 (solid bony healing). The operating technique and fixation was identical in all patients. K-wires were removed at a mean of 8.2 weeks for DBM and 7.7 weeks for the ICBG group.

All patients had a minimum follow-up of one year. All fusions healed both radiographically and clinically without complications. Review of the radiographs revealed significantly less visible healing at 8 weeks in the DBM group (mean score 1.50 versus 1.74 of the ICBG group, p< .05). Lower scores were also obtained for the DBM group at 12 and 24 weeks but they did not reach statistical significance.

In this study both DBM and ICBG were equally effective in achieving solid bone union for intercarpal fusions. However, the statistical power of this series is not adequate to conclude that healing rates are equal between the two graft materials. The radiographic appearance of bridging bone lagged behind in the DBM group. The biological significance of this finding is not clear; it could indicate delayed mineralization at the fusion site. Such a delay may be significant in graft choice for patients with healing impairment.

Correspondence should be addressed to Ms Larissa Welti, Scientific Secretary, EFORT Central Office, Technoparkstrasse 1, CH-8005 Zürich, Switzerland