header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

PATIENT PERCEIVED OUTCOMES OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT AT MIDTERM FOLLOW-UP



Abstract

Computer navigation assistance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) results in more consistently accurate postoperative alignment of the knee prostheses. However the medium and long term clinical outcomes of computer-navigated TKA are not widely published. Our aim was to compare patient perceived outcomes between computer navigation assisted and conventional TKA using the Oxford knee score (OKS).

We retrospectively collected data on 441 primary TKA carried out by a single surgeon in a dedicated arthroplasty centre over a period of four years. These were divided according to use of computer navigation (group A) or standard instrumentation (group B). There were no statistical differences in baseline Oxford knee score (OKS) and demographic data between the groups. 238 of these had at least a one-year follow-up with 109 in group A and 129 in group B. Two year follow-up data was available for 105 knees with 48 in group A and 57 in group B and a three year follow-up for 45 with 21 and 24 in groups A and B respectively. 12 patients had completed four year follow-up with seven and five knees in groups A and B respectively.

The mean OKS at 1-year follow up was 24.98 (range 12– 54, SD 9.34) for group A and 26.54 (range 12– 51, SD 10.18) for group B (p = 0.25). Similarly at 2-years the mean OKS was 25.40 (range 12– 53, SD 9.51) for group A and 25.56 (range 12– 46, SD 9.67) for group B (p = 0.94). The results were similar for three and four-year follow ups with p values not significant. This study thus revealed that computer assisted TKA does not appear to result in better patient satisfaction when compared to standard instrumentation at midterm follow up.

It is known from long term analysis of conventional TKA that mal-aligned implants have significantly higher failure rates beyond eight to ten years. As use of computer navigation assistance results in a less number of mal-aligned knee prostheses, we believe that these knees will have improved survivorship. The differences in OKS between the two groups should therefore be evident after eight to ten years.

Correspondence should be addressed to Mr K. Deep, General Secretary CAOS UK, 82 Windmill Road, Gillingham, Kent ME7 5NX UK. E Mail: caosuk@gmail.com